Evidence levels, recommendation levels
1. Increments of evidence¶
Increment |
Type |
Max. risk of bias |
1++ |
High-quality meta-analyses, systematic reviews of RCTs or RCTs |
Very low risk of bias |
1+ |
Well-conducted meta-analyses, systematic reviews of RCTs or RCTs |
Low risk of bias |
1 |
Meta-analyses, systematic reviews of RCTs or RCTs |
High risk of bias |
2+ |
Well-conducted case-control or cohort studies |
Low risk of confounding, bias or chance and at least a medium probability that the association is causal |
2 |
Case-control or cohort studies |
high risk of confounding, bias or chance and at least a significant risk that the association is not causal |
3 |
Non-analytical studies, e.g. case reports, case series |
|
4 |
Expert opinion |
|
2. Increments of the recommendation¶
Increment |
Recommendation |
A |
At least one meta-analysis, systematic review or RCT that has been rated 1++ and is directly applicable to the target population; |
|
or a systematic review of RCTs or a body of evidence consisting primarily of studies that are rated 1+, are directly applicable to the target population, and have overall consistency of results |
B |
A body of evidence that includes studies that are rated 2++, are directly applicable to the target population, and demonstrate overall agreement of results |
|
or extrapolated evidence from studies rated 1++ or 1+ |
C |
Body of evidence includes studies rated 2+ that are directly applicable to the target population and whose results are consistent overall |
|
or extrapolated evidence from studies rated 2++ |
D |
Evidence level 3 or 4 |
|
or extrapolated evidence from studies rated 2+ |
Diese Seite wurde am 13.04.2024 zuletzt aktualisiert.