Header Image
Strength and duration of action of ADHD medication

Sitemap

Strength and duration of action of ADHD medication

Only theoretically is the drug concentration proportional to the administered drug dose. In general pharmacological practice, there are high inter-individual differences by a factor of 8 to 30.1
Data from approval studies are of little help in determining the appropriate individual dose of a drug. These studies only examine the dose-effect relationship, not the drug concentration. Dosages for a drug given in specialist information, package inserts and textbooks refer to the average of the entire population of people with ADHD. This information is helpful as a guide, but should not be taken as a measure for the individual person with ADHD, who will vary in many ways:1

  • Gender
  • Size
  • Weight
  • Age
  • Compliance
  • Liver and kidney diseases
  • Comorbidities
  • Interactions
    • pharmacokinetic ((other) drugs)
    • xenobiotic (nutrition)
    • Drugs (nicotine, alcohol, caffeine, narcotics)
  • Genetics
    • Metabilization gene variants

Pharmacology covers the areas of pharmacodynamics (what an active ingredient does to the body) and pharmacokinetics (what the body does to the active ingredient).
The most important processes of pharmacokinetics are:23

  • Absorption (absorption)
  • Bioavailability
  • Distribution
  • Degradation (metabolism)
  • Excretion (excretion)

The release (liberation) of the active pharmaceutical ingredient is also relevant.

There is little generally valid data on ADHD medication and its use and effects. While the manufacturer’s information on the duration of action of methylphenidate is reasonably realistic and deviations tend to be of an individual nature, the stated duration of action of Vyvanse is only achieved by a small group of people with ADHD.
In the case of ADHD, however, medication must always be individually tested and adjusted.
This article is dedicated to the factors that individually influence the response and duration of action of a single dose of ADHD medication.

Although blood level values are an important factor for measuring a drug dosage, they cannot measure factors such as blood-brain barrier permeability or receptor activity, so that this value cannot represent an objective criterion for a drug effect.

1. Duration of action of active ingredients and preparations for ADHD

1.1. Manufacturer’s information on the duration of action

The data for drugs available in the USA are from Rodden.4 The figures in the table are mean values unless otherwise stated.
The actual duration of action varies from person to person and depends heavily on the metabolism of the person with ADHD. Approximately 5% of people with ADHD are super fast metabolizers. Due to increased CES1 activity, the effect of immediate release MPH may only last for 1 hour5 or that of a half-day sustained release preparation may only last 1.5 or 2 hours instead of 5 to 6 hours. Similarly, although apparently less frequently, there are people with ADHD for whom a preparation has a much longer effect.
For the metabolism of methylphenidate and amphetamine drugs, see below. There you will also find more detailed information on pharmacokinetics, e.g. speed of action and distribution of the effect curve.

In the case of half-day Retard preparations in particular, a second dose of medication is generally required at lunchtime to cover the day, which is usually at a lower dose.
Half-day treatment is not appropriate. ADHD is not a morning disorder.

Methylphenidate preparations Active ingredient Typical duration of action in hours (according to manufacturer) Sustained release Country
Ritalin, Methylphenidate HEXAL, Methylpheni TAD immediate release, Medikinet immediate release, Generic methylphenidate Methylphenidate 2.5 - 3.5; 3 - 45; 3.06 hours (2.5 to 3.875 / 1st quartile to 3rd quartile)6 immediate release EU, USA
Methylin Liquid Methylphenidate 3 - 4 immediate release USA
Ritalin SR Methylphenidate 5-8 hours duration of action theoretically, 3-5 hours duration of action practically7, 84 continuous release7 EU
Focalin Dexmethylphenidate 4 - 6 immediate release CH, USA
Equasym Retard/XL Methylphenidate 6 - 88 / 8 9 Two-phase retardation EU
Medikinet adult (adults), Medikinet retard (children) (bioequivalent)10 Methylphenidate 6 - 88; 4.65 hours (4.0 to 5.0 / 1st quartile to 3rd quartile)11 Two-phase retardation EU
Ritalin LA, Ritalin Adult (bioequivalent) Methylphenidate 6 - 87 / 8 8; 4.6 hours (3.38 to 6.0 / 1st quartile to 3rd quartile)12 EU; USA only Ritalin LA
Methysym Methylphenidate up to 8 sustained release since 01.06.2021 in D
Metadate CD Methylphenidate 8 - 10 sustained release USA
Daytrana Methylphenidate 10 (when worn for 9 hours) Patch USA
Concerta, methylphenidate hydrochloride-neuraxpharm (bioequivalent), methylphenidate AL sustained release (bioequivalent) Methylphenidate 8 - 128, 10 - 127, 1213; 10.2 hours (7.5 to 11.5 / 1st quartile to 3rd quartile)14 sustained release D, CH, USA
Focalin XR Dexmethylphenidate 8 - 12 sustained release CH, USA
Methylphenidate hydrochloride Ratiopharm15 Methylphenidate 12 sustained release EU
Methylphenidate hydrochloride Hexal16 Methylphenidate 12 sustained release EU
Kinecteen Methylphenidate 12 sustained release EU
Aptensio XR Methylphenidate 12 sustained release USA
Cotempla XR-ODT Methylphenidate 12 - 13 sustained release USA
Quillichew ER Methylphenidate 12 - 13 sustained release USA
Quillivant XR Methylphenidate 12 - 13 sustained release USA
Jornay PM Methylphenidate 12 - 14 sustained release USA
Amphetamine preparations Active ingredient Duration of action in hours (according to manufacturer) Sustained release Country
Dexedrine Dextroamphetamine 3 - 4 immediate release USA
ProCentra Dextroamphetamine 3 - 6 immediate release USA
Zenzedi Dextroamphetamine 3 - 6 immediate release USA
Desoxyn Methamphetamine 4 - 6 immediate release USA
Adderall Mixed amphetamine salts 4 - 6 immediate release USA
Evekeo amphetamine sulfate 4 - 6 immediate release USA
Attentin Dextroamphetamine 5 - 6 immediate release Germany, since end of 2011
Dexamine Dextroamphetamine 5 - 6 immediate release Switzerland, as extemporaneous preparation
Dexedrine ER Dextroamphetamine 5 - 10 sustained release USA
Adderall XR amphetamine mixed salts 10 - 12 sustained release USA
Adzenys ER Amphetamine 10 - 12 sustained release USA
Adzenys XR-ODT Amphetamine 10 - 12 sustained release USA
Vyvanse, Vyvanse, Tyvanse, generics Lisdexamfetamine 13 (children); 14 (adults) (in practice sometimes significantly lower values); in 60 % of people with ADHD 7 hours and less (see below) Prodrug EU, USA
Dyanavel XR Amphetamine 13 sustained release USA
Mydayis Mixed amphetamine salts 14 - 16 sustained release USA
Non-stimulants Active ingredient Duration of action in hours (according to manufacturer) Sustained release Country
Strattera, Agakalin Atomoxetine all day / individual 8 to 21 hours17 immediate release USA
Intuniv Guanfacine all day; peak concentration after approx. 5 hours; elimination half-life approx. 18 hours sustained release USA
The course of the effect curves differs considerably depending on the preparation.18

1.2. Experience of the duration of action

1.2.1. Experience of the duration of action of a single dose of lisdexamfetamine

Three online surveys among people with ADHD in German-speaking countries adhs-forum.adxs.org (80 participants), in an english-language subreddit on Vyvanse (467 participants) and in the ADxS medication duration survey (223 participants for LDX, as of December 19, 2023) on how long a single dose of lisdexamfetamine (LDX, e.g. Vyvanse) worked for them:

Duration of action Single dose LDX Participants (out of 770)
5 hours and less 36.2 %
6 to 7 hours 25.2 %
8 to 9 hours 17.3 %
10 to 11 hours 12.5 %
12 hours and more 8.8 %

The distribution towards a much shorter duration of action than the 10 to 12 hours specified by the manufacturer is very clear. In over a third of cases, a single dose is only effective for up to 5 hours, and in just under two thirds for 7 hours or less. Only 21.3% of the people with ADHD achieve the duration of action of 10 to 12 hours or longer specified by the manufacturer. This is also consistent with the numerous reports of Vyvanse users in the forum who require more than a single dose per day. Some users require 3 doses (whereby the subsequent doses are generally lower than the previous ones).

Among the participants in the ADxS drug duration of action survey the single dose of 43.3 mg for the n = 104 users with a duration of action of up to 7 hours was slightly higher than the single dose of 40.7 mg for the n = 119 users with a duration of action of 8 hours or more. The values barely differed by age in adults.
The dose level also did not differ significantly according to weight (up to 70 kg 40.4 mg, 71 to 90 kg 42.1 mg, over 90 kg 44.4 mg).

Interestingly, there were also several people with ADHD in whom not only Vyvanse/Vyvanse but also methylphenidate had a much shorter effect. As Vyvanse/Vyvanse and MPH are metabolized by different enzymes, this points to mechanisms other than overactive enzyme gene variants, as also explained in this article.

1.2.2. Empirical values of the duration of action of a single dose of MPH immediate release

Among the participants in the ADxS drug duration of action survey (as of 12/19/2013), the duration of action of a single dose of immediate release MPH was on average 2.95 hours (n = 20) for single doses of up to 12.5 mg (average: 9 mg) and 3.43 hours (n = 8) for single doses of 15 to 20 mg (average: 18.75 mg). The overall average was 3.18 hours and 14.8 mg.

1.2.3. Empirical values for the duration of action of a single dose of MPH Halbtagesretard

Among the participants in the ADxS drug duration of action survey the duration of action of a single dose of half-day sustained-release MPHs (Medikinet retard, Medikinet adult, Ritalin adult, Ritalin LA) was 4.61 hours (n = 163). The average single dose was 21.7 mg.

Duration of action Single dose MPH Half-day retard Participants (out of 163)
up to 1 hour 0.6 %
> 1 to 2 hours 5.5 %
> 2 to 3 hours 7.4 %
> 3 to 4 hours 23.9 %
> 4 to 5 hours 43.6 %
6 to 7 hours 14.1 %
8 hours and more 4.9 %

This means that 67.7% of people with ADHD reported a duration of action of a single dose of 3 to 5 hours and 81.8% reported a duration of action of 3 to 7 hours. The results are therefore significantly more consistent and closer to the manufacturer’s specifications than with Vyvanse.
Medikinet retard and Medikinet adult (which are bioidentical) had an average duration of action of 4.58 hours (n = 132) at an average of 20.64 mg, Ritalin adult and Ritalin LA (which are also bioidentical) had an average duration of action of 4.74 hours (n = 31) at an average of 26.3 mg.

In the following, we explain the influencing factors that can individually affect the duration of the medication effect (especially with ADHD medication).

2. Single dose level

Some people with ADHD report that higher single doses of amphetamine (especially lisdexamfetamine) have a longer effect.
However, the pharmacological tests of different lisdexamfetamine doses show that the Tmax is approximately the same.19 Tests with doses above the drug dosage showed that lysine cleavage is not saturated or slowed down by higher doses.20
There are indications that the duration of action of lisdexamfetamine is only delayed by 1 to 1.5 hours compared to dextroamphetamine, but not prolonged.21 This casts serious doubt on the manufacturer’s claims of 12 to 14 hours per single dose and is consistent with the data presented above under Experience of the duration of action of a single dose of lisdexamfetamine Above from people with ADHD.

The duration of action of methylphenidate preparations is dose-independent.22

3. Stomach passage speed

In addition to the speed of passage through the small intestine, gastric function also plays a role. Gastric motility and emptying rate influence how quickly a substance reaches the small intestine. In the case of paracetamol, for example, gastric emptying is the speed-determining step for the appearance of the substance in the blood plasma. Delayed or even accelerated gastric emptying can therefore fundamentally influence the kinetics of orally absorbed drugs, so that, for example, the necessary drug levels are not reached or only reached with a delay23

With age, the surface area of the small intestine and the speed of gastric emptying decrease. At the same time, the gastric pH increases. Nevertheless, these changes usually have no effect on drug absorption.2425

Anticholinergics can slow down the movement of drugs through the stomach into the small intestine.2425

Gastric reduction or gastric bypass increased the dexamphetamine level during lisdexamfetamine intake. Tmax tended to be reduced. For ritalinic acid (from MPH) and atomoxetine there was no change in AUC0-24, atomoxetine showed a higher Cmax and a shorter Tmax. The number of subjects was very small.26

4. Small intestine

4.1. Small intestine length

In children, the small intestine is shortened so that absorption through the small intestine is reduced.2728

4.2. Small intestine passage speed

“With ingested medicines, the passage time through the stomach and small intestine represents a natural upper limit for the release of the active ingredient: Once the tablet has left the small intestine, nothing more can be absorbed, so release is limited to a period of around 8-10 hours.”29

This time can vary from individual to individual, as can the speed of intestinal transit. This is probably the reason why some super fast metabolizers report a duration of action of 1 to 2 hours for Medikinet and 3 hours for Vyvanse. They also report that they have to eat much more often during the day than others.
For a longer duration of action (not only on average) than the intestinal passage, mechanisms are therefore required that go beyond absorption from the small intestine.

5. Acid balance

pH is the abbreviation for potentia hydrogenii and is a logarithmic measure of the proton concentration (H+ or H3O+) in an aqueous solution. The more protons present in a solution, the lower the pH value.
The pH value ranges from 0 to 14 and indicates how alkaline something is. 7 is neutral. The higher the pH value (above 7), the more alkaline, the lower (below 7), the more acidic.
The usual pH value is:

  • in the stomach30
    • fasting pH 1.5 (1-2)
    • increasing with food intake
      • depending on species and quantity up to pH 5-6
      • then decrease to initial value
    • Premature babies have less acidic stomachs (pH > 4) and are susceptible to intestinal infections
    • Older people have lower stomach acidity (pH 6.6 in 80% of study participants) and are susceptible to bacterial infections in the stomach and intestines
    • Gastric acid (hydrochloric acid) is produced in parietal cells by the proton pump
      • This is why proton pump inhibitors reduce stomach acid (omeprazole, lansoprazole, rabeprazole, esomeprazole, pantoprazole)
    • Excess acids are absorbed by buffer systems and excreted via the respiratory system and kidneys
  • in urine31
    • 6.0 Average value
    • 6.6 and more for 10 % of people
    • 7.2 and more at 1 %

Depending on the duration of acid exposure, the pH value can be influenced:30

  • Solubility of active ingredients
  • Stability of active ingredients

Food influences the body pH value32
Foods with a high proportion of animal protein (meat, fish, cheese, eggs) form acids as metabolic end products.
Plant foods (fruit, vegetables, leafy salads, wholemeal products) are predominantly alkaline.

5.1. Acid balance and amphetamine medication

Amphetamine drugs:
The amount of dextroamphetamine excreted unchanged and thus the remaining pharmacologically active dextroamphetamine depends on the pH value of the urine.33343536

  • shortened duration of action due to high urine acidity (low pH value), e.g. due to (see below for a detailed list)
    • Ascorbic acid (vitamin C)36
      • doubtful. Ascorbic acid (vitamin C) taken orally left the pH value almost unchanged (+ 0.03)37
    • Thiazide diuretics
    • Animal protein-rich diet
    • Diabetes
    • respiratory acidosis
  • prolonged duration of action due to low (alkalized) urine acidity (high pH value)38, e.g. through (see below for a detailed list)
    • Potassium citrate
    • Sodium hydrogen carbonate
    • Mineral water with bicarbonate39
    • A diet with a high proportion of fruit, vegetables, whole grains
    • Urinary tract infections
    • Vomiting
    • Change of diet, e.g. from a meat-based to a vegetarian diet40
    • massive intake of agents to neutralize stomach acid40

A urine pH value of 5.0 (acidic) can reduce the pharmacologically effective amount of d-AMP to a quarter of the value at a urine pH value of 8.0 (basic).41 AUC of amphetamine after 11 mg at urine pH:

  • pH 5.0: 361 µg-h/L
  • pH 6.5: 692 µg-h/L
  • pH 8.0: 1325 µg-h/L

The highest available value of the pharmacological d-AMP quantity (Cmax) also correlates with the urine pH value, but to a much lesser extent, so that an acidic urine also correlates with a somewhat weaker, but above all with a significantly shorter effect33
While 54.5% of orally ingested amphetamine was excreted unchanged at pH = 5.0 (acidic urine), this value was 2.9% at pH = 8 (alkaline urine). At uncontrolled pH, 14.5 % was excreted 3341

One person with ADHD, in whom lisdexamfetamine had too short an effect (single dose of 50 mg worked for 4 hours), reported that drinking 1.5 liters of sparkling water with 1,800 mg nhc/L in the morning increased the effect so much that he now only needed 30 mg LDX, which then had the same strength and duration of effect as 50 mg before.

5.2. Acid balance and methylphenidate

In a laboratory study (= in vitro), up to 60 % of the methylphenidate was spontaneously hydrolyzed to (pharmacologically inactive) ritalinic acid, whereby this hydrolysis was pH-dependent.42
In bacterial cultures in which MPH was not metabolized, the pH value after 24 hours was between 4.0 and 5.5; with high MPH hydrolysis, the pH value was between 7.5 and 8.0. E. coli BW25113 cultures with an average pH value of 7.8 hydrolyzed 70 % of the MPH; E. coli DSM1058 and E. coli DSM12250 with an average pH value of 7.6 hydrolyzed 50 % of the MPH. The correlation between MPH-hydrolyzing bacterial cultures and the pH value of the bacterial cultures after 24 hours was very high (r = 0.89, r2 = 0.79, p-value = 0.0006). In pure culture medium, less than 20 % of the MPH was hydrolyzed to ritalinic acid at a pH of 6.0 and 80 % at a pH of 8.0. Bacteria did not contribute to the metabolization of MPH.42
In adults, only 22 % (+/- 8 %) of dMPH and 5 % (+/- 3 %) reach the systemic circulation; in children the figure is 31 % (+/- 16 %).43 Schematically, 20 % of MPH is oxidized in the liver.44 80 % of the MPH ingested is excreted in the urine within 48 hours (80 % of which is excreted as ritalinic acid and 1 % unmetabolized), 3 % in the faeces. 43

MPH hydrolysis in vitro as a function of pH value

Source: Aresti-Sanz J, Schwalbe M, Pereira RR, Permentier H, El Aidy S (2021): Stability of Methylphenidate under Various pH Conditions in the Presence or Absence of Gut Microbiota. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021 Jul 27;14(8):733. doi: 10.3390/ph14080733. PMID: 34451830; PMCID: PMC8398889 (unchanged)42 Published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY).

According to these laboratory results for MPH, a high pH value should be associated with a reduced MPH effect. This would be diametrically opposed to the shortened amphetamine effect also confirmed empirically (= in vivo) at a low urine pH value. It remains to be seen whether the study results for MPH are empirically confirmed. Since MPH, like amphetamine, is slightly alkaline, the results for MPH also contradict general pharmacological experience. Furthermore, this would not explain the purely empirically observed simultaneous shortening of the duration of action of amphetamine drugs and MPH preparations in some persons with ADHD, for which no comprehensible mechanism has yet been found.

Medikinet retard, Medikinet adult:
If the gastric pH is above 5.5, Medikinet retard and Medikinet adult may cause dose dumping phenomena: The active ingredient is released too quickly and thus develops increased effects and side effects. This can be caused by, among other things

  • Proton pump inhibitors (e.g. pantoprazole, omeprazole)
    • doubtful for omeprazole, which according to another source barely affects the pH value (+ 0.10)37
    • contradictory: proton pump inhibitors in general reduced the pH value very strongly (- 1.5; n = 10)45
  • Antacids
  • H2 antagonists (e.g. ranitidine, famotidine) (less likely)
  • age-related increase
  • atrophic gastritis

One person with ADHD reported a barely given effect of Medikinet from 20 to 60 mg. The additional consumption of dry rice cakes led to a temporary effect that was not predictable. The additional intake of antacids (gastric acid inhibitors) resulted in a reliable effect of MPH.

Ritalin adult:
Ritalin adult, on the other hand, releases MPH independently of pH. The prescribing information mentions a reduction in absorption as a probable interaction with antacids.46

5.3. Acid balance and memantine

Memantine:

  • Prolonged effect due to alkalized urine
    • In alkaline urine (high pH), the renal elimination rate of memantine may be reduced by a factor of 7 to 9.40

5.4. Factors that increase alkalinity (high pH value)

Information in the following list that does not have its own source is taken from 47. The website cited as the source is no longer accessible. The information was found to be incorrect in several cases and should therefore be checked individually.

Factors that favor alkaline urine (high pH value) are:

  • Environmental factors:
    • Fluctuations during the day
      • There are different profiles:31
        • “normal” pH curve with three peaks at the morning and after-meal (postprandial) fluctuations, with a low night-time pH value
          • Meals cause a spontaneous increase in alkalinity (urine pH value reaches at least 6.8 1 to 2 hours after meals)
        • Sustained low pH value without real fluctuations
        • A single afternoon peak with almost complete absence of a morning fluctuation
        • Reversal of the “normal” curve with low daytime level and high nocturnal plateau
    • Body surface area (unclear whether high or low)48
    • Cadmium exposure
    • Heparin
    • Air pressure reduced; hypobaric ventilation49
    • Mercury exposure
    • Female gender5051
    • Age: stomach acid decreases, uric acid increases continuously (at least in people with kidney stones) with age5251
    • Low income5354 (socio-economic status?)
    • Urine stored too warm after collection47
  • Diseases:
    • 21-hydroxylase deficiency
    • 3-hydroxydehydrogenase deficiency
    • Rejection of a kidney transplant
    • Acute post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis
    • Amyloidosis
    • Atrophic gastritis (age-related gastritis)
    • Calcium deficiency31
    • Carbonic anhydrase II deficiency
    • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
    • Vomiting
    • Acquired adrenal insufficiency
    • Familial methyl oxidase deficiency
    • Galactosemia
    • Gout
    • Glycogen storage disease
    • Urine dilution31
    • Increased urine flow31
    • Hereditary fructose intolerance
    • Hyperventilation31
    • Hypoxia55
    • Lactosuria
    • Light chain multiple myeloma
    • Lowe syndrome
    • Lupus nephritis
    • Malabsorption
    • Medullary cystic disease
    • Metabolic alkalosis
    • Metachromatic leukodystrophy
    • Mineralocorticoid deficiency, transient in infancy
    • Wilson’s disease
    • Multiple myeloma
    • Kidney transplant
    • Renal vein thrombosis
    • Obstructive nephropathy
    • Pseudohypoaldosteronism
    • Renovascular hypertension
    • Salt-wasting nephritis
    • Sjögren’s syndrome
    • Tubulointerstitial disease
    • Tyrosinemia
    • Vitamin D deficiency
    • Vitamin D resistance
  • Medication:
    • Acetazolamide: urine pH increase of + 2.0 with intravenous administration (very strong); + 0.39 (weak) with oral administration37
      • Long-term treatment with acetazolamide is associated with an increased risk of urolithiasis56
    • ADV7103 (citrate + bicarbonate): Increase in urine pH by + 1.27 (strong)37
    • Ambroxol57
    • Amiloride
    • Aminoglycosides
    • Ammonium chloride
    • Antibiotics58
    • Ascorbic acid (vitamin C): Increase in urine pH value by + 0.03 (neutral)37
    • Bicarbonates
      • Bicarbonate-rich mineral water59
      • Bicarbonate loading (soda loading, sodium bicarbonate loading): + 1.44 (very strong)37
        • Ingestion of sodium bicarbonate (= baking soda, double-carbonated sodium bicarbonate, baking powder, baking soda, Bullrich salt)
        • Dose 0.2 to 0.3 g/kg
        • 10 minutes before physical exertion
        • Long-term intake can trigger increased acid production in the stomach as a counter-reaction
        • Sodium bicarbonate in the stomach produces CO2 - risk of overstretching the stomach wall
    • Citrate: 0.61 (moderate)3759
      • Citrus juices
      • Orange juice: increase in urine pH by + 0.68 (moderate)37
    • Citro-soda: increase in urine pH by + 1.56 (very strong)37
      • Ingredients: Sodium bicarbonate 1.716 g, sodium citrate 0.613 g, citric acid 0.702 g, tartaric acid 0.858 g
    • Cholestyramine
    • Converting enzyme inhibitors
    • Corticotropin
    • Coumarin
    • Diazoxide
    • Exenatide: increase in urine pH by + 0.51 intravenously (moderate)37 (diabetes medication)
    • Glycine: increase in urine pH by + 0.20 (neutral)37
    • Indomethacin: increase in urine pH by + 1.0 (strong)37
    • Potassium citrate37
      • Recommendation of the American Urological Association (AUA) to increase the pH value of the urine
      • Food additive E332
      • Food supplement, freely available as a powder or in capsule form
        • Avoid in case of hyperkalemia - therefore always consult a doctor, population prevalence of hyperkalemia is 2 to 3 %
    • Potassium gluconate: increase in urine pH by + 0.46 (weak)37
      • Potassium salt of gluconic acid, medication against potassium deficiency
    • Potassium hydrogen carbonate (potassium bicarbonate): Increase in urine pH value by + 0.89 (moderate)3760
    • Potassium sodium hydrogen carbonate (also potassium sodium hydrogen citrate)61
      • Drug to increase the urine pH value
    • L-tryptophan: increase in urine pH by + 0.20 (neutral)37
    • Magnesium salts without chlorides62
    • Metolazone
    • Monosodium glutamate63
    • Sodium hydrogen carbonate (sodium bicarbonate, baking soda): Increase in urine pH by + 1.19 orally; + 1.12 intravenously; strong37
    • Sodium L-ascorbate with sodium saccharin64
    • Niacin
    • Omeprazole (proton pump inhibitor): Increase in urine pH by + 0.10 (neutral)37
    • Spironolactone
    • Streptozocin
    • Topiramate: increase in urine pH by + 0.45 (weak)37
  • Foodstuffs
    • DASH diet: increase in urine pH value by + 0.5 (moderate)37
      • A diet rich in fruit, vegetables, wholegrain products, low-fat dairy products, fish, poultry, nuts and seeds
    • Cucumbers: increase in urine pH by + 0.17 (neutral)37
    • Potatoes: increase in urine pH by + 0.28 (weak)37
    • Lime Juice: increase in urine pH by + 0.25 (neutral)37
      • Unclear whether lime syrup made from lime juice, water and sugar or pure lime juice is meant
    • Melon juice: urine pH increase by + 0.36 (cantaloupe; weak)37; higher than orange juice (moderate)65
    • Milk: increase in urine pH by + 0.36 (weak)37
    • Fruit + vegetable rich diet: urine pH increase by + 0.35 (weak)37
    • Orange juice: increase in urine pH by + 0.68 (moderate)37
    • French fries: Increase in urine pH value by + 0.25 (neutral)37
    • Vegetarian diet
      • Lacto-ovo vegetarian diet: increase in urine pH by + 0.85 (moderate)37
      • Mixed western vegetarian diet: urine pH increase of + 0.56 (moderate)37
    • Vitamin C: increase in urine pH by + 0.03 (neutral)37
    • See below (PRAL value table)

5.5. Factors that increase acidity (low pH value)

Information in the following list that does not have its own source is taken from 47. The website cited as the source is no longer accessible. The information was found to be incorrect in several cases and should therefore be checked individually.

Factors that favor acidic urine (low pH value) are:

  • Environmental factors:
    • Bed rest
    • Aldosterone
    • Lead exposure66
    • Cadmium67
    • Toluene
    • Vanadium
    • Age: stomach acid decreases, uric acid increases continuously (at least in people with kidney stones) with age 5251
    • Male gender50
    • High income5354 (socio-economic status?)
    • Physical strain in a hot environment
      • Working as a rice field worker in Thailand68
      • Work as a sugar cane harvester in El Salvador69 or Nicaragua70
      • Stay in the desert71
    • Sleep deprivation: - 0.0 (neutral)37
  • Diseases:
    • Breathing problems
      • Obstruction of the airways or prevention of gas exchange in the lungs, e.g. pulmonary edema (water in the lungs)
      • Pneumonia (lung inflammation)
      • Loss of functional lung tissue, e.g. in tuberculosis
      • Insufficient respiratory drive, for example in the case of sleeping pill intoxication
      • Paralysis of the respiratory muscles, e.g. in polio
      • Malfunction of the respiratory reflexes
    • Adrenal cortical hyperfunction
    • Adrenal cortical hypofunction
    • Amyloidosis
    • Autoimmune thyroiditis
    • Balkan nephropathy
    • Chronic active hepatitis
    • Chronic kidney disease
    • Chronic renal insufficiency
    • Chronic pyelonephritis
    • Cystinosis
    • Diabetes mellitus
    • Distal renal tubular acidosis
    • Gastrinoma
      • Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, rare pancreatic dry tumor
      • Increases stomach acid
    • Fibrosing alveolitis
    • Urinary tract obstruction (blockage in the urinary system that prevents the flow of urine from the kidneys to the urethra)
    • Helicobacter pylori infection
      • Increases stomach acid
    • Hepatolenticular degeneration
    • Hereditary fructose intolerance
    • Hypercalciuria, idiopathic
    • Hypergammaglobulinemia
    • Hyperparathyroidism
      • Increased stomach acid in 30 % of people with ADHD
    • Cryoglobulinemia
    • Fabry disease
    • Wilson’s disease
    • Marfan syndrome
    • Medullary sponge kidney
    • Metabolic acidosis
    • Metabolic syndrome72
    • Kidney transplant rejection
    • Kidney failure
    • Polyarteritis nodosa
    • Primary biliary cirrhosis
    • Proximal renal tubular acidosis (type II)
    • Sickle cell anemia
    • Sjögren’s syndrome
    • Tension-dependent distal renal tubular acidosis (type 1)
    • Vitamin D intoxication
  • Medication:
    • Acetaminophen = Paracetamol
    • Acetazolamide
    • Amiloride
    • Ammonium chloride (ammonia): - 1.63 (very strong)3733
    • Amphotericin B
    • Acetylsalicylic acid (Aspirin)
      • Inhibits prostaglandins that protect the stomach lining from acidity
      • Protaglandin deficiency leads to inflammation of the mucous membrane, which damages the parietal cells that produce stomach acid (gastritis)
    • Carbenoxolone
    • Cefdinir
    • Cimetidine
    • Citric acid: urine pH reduction by - 0.06 (neutral)37
    • Dapagliflocin: urine pH reduction by - 0.10 (neutral)37 (diabetes drug)
    • Diclofenac
      • Inhibits prostaglandins that protect the stomach lining from acidity
      • Protaglandin deficiency leads to inflammation of the mucous membrane, which damages the parietal cells that produce stomach acid (gastritis) * Diflunisal
    • Etodolac
    • Fenoprofen
    • Flurbiprofen
    • Furosemide: reduction in urine pH by - 0.52 intravenously (not statistically significant)37
    • Ibuprofen
      • Inhibits prostaglandins that protect the stomach lining from acidity
      • Protaglandin deficiency leads to inflammation of the mucous membrane, which damages the parietal cells that produce stomach acid (gastritis)
    • Ifosfamide
    • Indomethacin
    • Ketoprofen
    • Lithium
    • Mafenide
    • Methionine: reduction in urine pH by - 0.71 (moderate)37
      • Essential amino acid
      • Without prescription
      • Only takes effect after a few days
    • Monomagnesium-L-aspartate hydrochloride62
    • Mefenamic acid
    • Naproxen
    • Niacinamide
    • Ofloxacin
    • Orthophosphate
    • Parathyroid extract
    • Proton pump inhibitors: reduction in urine pH by - 1.5 (very strong, n = 10)45
    • Ranitidine
    • Triamteren
  • Foodstuffs
    • Apple cider vinegar: Urine pH reduction by - 0.21 (very weak)37
    • Cranberry: reduction in urine pH value by - 0.16 (neutral)37
    • Protein: high intake of animal protein in the diet73
    • Fasting: reduction in urine pH value by - 1.2 (very strong)37
    • Fructose: reduction in urine pH by - 0.26 (very weak)37
    • Sodium chloride (table salt): urine pH reduction by - 0.47 (weak)37
    • Ketogenic diet: reduction in urine pH by - 0.55 (moderate)37
    • Low-oxidant diet: reduction in urine pH by - 0.10 (neutral)37
    • High-protein diet: reduction in urine pH by - 0.65 (moderate)37
    • See below (PRAL value table)

5.6. Influence of food on acid-base balance (PRAL value)

Food can significantly influence the pH value of urine. The decisive factor here is not so much an acidic taste, but rather the PRAL value. The intake of foods with a negative PRAL value correlates with an alkaline pH urine value, an acid-forming diet correlates with alkaline pH urine values below 6.0. The urine pH value can be measured with simple pH test strips from the drugstore or the Internet. Fats and carbohydrates do not normally affect the acid-base balance.
In the case of proteins, a distinction must be made between plant and animal proteins. After 7 days of a vegetarian diet, the pH urine value increases and the PRAL value decreases, as does 2 or 3 days of a vegetarian diet per week.74 A vegetarian diet thus correlates with a prolonged amphetamine drug effect.
Foods with a high oxalate content can increase acid formation.39
One study gives the following calculation method:75 PRAL (mEq/d) = 0.49 x protein (g/d) + 0.037 x phosphorus (mg/d) - 0.021 x potassium (mg/d) - 0.026 x magnesium (mg/d) - 0.013 x calcium (mg/d).

In other words, foods with a strongly negative PRAL value cause alkaline urine (less acidic, increase the pH value) and thus promote a prolonged effect of amphetamine drugs. Foods with a high PRAL value cause acidic urine (lower pH) and thus promote a shortened effect of amphetamine drugs. According to this model, hard cheese is suitable for shortening the effects of amphetamine drugs, while raisins could prolong them.

Food PRAL value table

Food (unsweetened, untreated) PRAL value per 100 g (negative value makes urine more alkaline, positive value makes urine more acidic)
Chanterelles, dried -61.976
Cocoa powder, heavily de-oiled -4976
Beet syrup/sugar beet molasses -31.676
Agar -25.576
Apple pectin -21.476
Apricots, dried -21.276
Raisins -21.077
Banana chips (banana, dried) -19.676
Tomato paste -19.476
Dried figs -18.1
Spinach -14.077
Prunes -12.376
Parsley -12.0
Kidney beans, dried -1276
Spinach raw -11.839
Soy flour -11.576
Locust bean gum -11.576
Guar gum -11.576
Potato starch -11.576
Dark chocolate -11.5
Apple syrup/fruit syrup -11.276
Dried fruit, mixed -10.376
Dates, dried -10.176
Beans, white, dried -9.976
Onions, dried -9.776
Spinach leaves -9.776
Apple rings, dried -9.676
Pineapple, dried -9.676
Potatoes -8.539 -4.075 stored -4.077
Avocado -8.576
Soy bread -876
Kale -8.039
Fennel -7.9
Swiss chard -7.676
Rocket -7,5
Beans unclear: -7.439 or 1.139
Chestnuts, pre-cooked and vacuum-packed -7.476
Basil -7.3
Parsnip -7.276
Radish -7.176
Bananas -6.939
Kale -6.876
Lamb’s lettuce -6.6
Blackcurrant -6.577
Lamb’s lettuce -676
Beet -5.976
Brussels sprouts -5.776
Carrots, raw -5.739 young -4.977
Kiwi -5.639 -4.177
Chives -5.3
Celery -5.039 -5.277
Apricots -4.877
Carrot juice -4.8
Zucchini -4.677
Lettuce -4.339 -2.577
Mushrooms -4.239 -1.477
Tomatoes -4.139 -3.177
Radish -3.777
Orange juice -3.739 -2.977
Oranges -3.639 -2.777
Broccoli -3.639 -1.277
Fruit tea -3.539
Grapefruit -3.239 -1.077
Green beans -3.177
Cherries -3.139 3.677
Mango -3.039
Soya -2.939
Pears -2.977
Tomato juice -2.877
Hazelnuts -2.877
Pineapple -2.777
Strawberries -2.539 -2.277
Cucumbers -2.439 -0.877
Peaches -2.477
Lemons -2.339 Lemon juice -2.577
Red wine -2.239 -2.47577
Asparagus -2.239
Normal spaghetti -2.239 6.577 8.075
Apple juice, unsweetened -2.277
Chicory -2.077
Watermelon -2.039 -1.977
Onions -2.039 -1.577
Eggplant -2.039 -3.477
Apples -1.939 -2.277
Hazelnuts -1.939
Leek -1.877
Apollinaris mineral water -1.877
Iceberg lettuce -1.677
Jam -1.577
Coffee (drink) -1.477
Paprika, green -1.477
Cauliflower -1.339 -4.077
Milk chocolate -1.3
White wine -1.239 dry, -1.277
Mineral water -0.839
Margarine -0.839 -0.577
Soy milk -0.6
Drinking chocolate milk -0.639 -0.477
Asparagus -0.477
Honey -0.377
Tofu -0.3
Indian tea (drink) -0.377
Green tea -0.339
Draught beer -0.277
Cream -0.239
Volvic mineral water -0.177
Strong beer -0.177
White sugar -0.177
Olive oil 03977
Sunflower oil 03977
Butter 0.139 0.677
Milk (whole milk, skimmed milk) 0.239 0.775 1.1 77 Pasteurized UHT milk 0.777
Cola 0.239 0.477
Buttermilk 0.577
Milk ice 0,677
Full-bodied beer, light 0.977
Beans unclear: 1.139 or -7.439
Peas 1.277
Sour cream, fresh 1.277
Fruit yogurt 1.277
Natural yogurt 1,577
Rice, cooked 1.677
Wholemeal wheat bread 1.877
Pistachios 2.039
Almonds 2.039
Chicken egg white 2.139 1.177
Lenses 2.139 3.577
Rice, unpeeled 2.339
Milk chocolate 2.477
Chickpeas 2.639
Biscuit 3.075
Rye crispbread 3.377
Madeira cake 3.777
White bread 3,77577
Mixed wheat bread 3.877
Mixed rye bread 4.077
Rye bread 4.177
Rice, hulled, raw 4.575 4.677
Corn tortilla 4.839
Greek yogurt 5.339
Pork sausage 5.839
Rusk 5.9
Wholemeal rye flour 5.977
White bread 6.075
Cornflakes 6.077
Peanuts 6.239
Egg noodles 6.477
Vienna sausages / Frankfurter sausages 6.777
Walnuts 6,877
Haddock 6.877
Wheat flour, extract 6.977
Herring 7.077
Wheat tortilla 7.239
Wholemeal spaghetti 7.377
Spelt (green spelt, wholemeal) 7.5
Shrimps 7.6
Cottage cheese 7.939 8.777
Meat 8.078
Fish 8.078
Sheep’s cheese 8.276
Peanuts, unsalted 8.377
Wheat flour, wholemeal 8.477
Rump steak 8,877
Hen’s egg (whole egg) 9.039 8.277 4.075
Pine nuts 8.876
Kassel 8.876
Quinoa, raw 8.976
Veal fillet 9.077
Salmon 9.176
Redfish 9.176
Schnitzel, pork 9.376
Blue cheese 9.376
Duck 9.576
Maize flour, wholegrain 9.676
Turkey meat 9.977
Roquefort 1076
Herring 10.176
Lunch meat 10.277
Sunflower seeds 10.376
Mozzarella 10.476
Turkey 10,576
Smoked salmon 10.576
Liver sausage 10.677
Yeast 10.676
Oat flakes (wholegrain) 10.777
Trout, brown, steamed 10.877
Calf’s liver, raw 10.976
Shrimps 11.176
Vegetable stock, granulated (powder) 11.176
Quark 11.177
Salami 11,677
Pumpkin seeds 11.376
Macadamia nut kernels 11.576
Lamb 1276
Einkorn flour 1276
Cream cheese 12.439
Brown rice 12.577
Beef 12.539 lean 7.877
Edam 13.176
Prawns 13.239
Corned beef 13,277
Mountain cheese 13.376
Butter cheese 13.776
Nuts 13.839
Ladyfingers 13.876
Salmon 14.039
Calf’s liver 14.2
Pork 14.739 lean 7.977
Beef liver 14.776
Camembert 15.078 14.677
Mussels 15.239
Crabs 15,5
Oil sardines 15.939
Brazil nut kernels 1676
Chicken 16.539, 11.8176, 8.777
Chia seeds 17.376
Chicken egg yolk 18.139 23.477
Cod 19.839 Fillet 7.177
Gouda 20.039 18.677
Cheddar 20.075
Hemp seeds, hulled 21,3476
Emmental 21.5
Parmesan 21.439 34.277
Gruyère 23.3276
Cheddar, low-fat 26.477
Baking powder (sodium hydrogen carbonate + acid + anti-caking agent) 297.9976

6. Mechanical effect of food intake

6.1. Food intake as a prerequisite for the retarding effect of Medikinet

For Medikinet adult and Medikinet sustained release, prior or simultaneous food intake is a prerequisite for sustained release. If there is no food intake, the MPH is released twice as quickly. The released MPH dose is therefore approximately doubled and the duration of action is approximately halved.

Other sustained release preparations use other sustained release mechanisms that do not rely on simultaneous food intake, such as

  • Ritalin adult
  • Ritalin LA
  • Methysym
  • Equasym Retard/XL
  • Methylphenidate hydrochloride-neuraxpharm
  • Kinecteen
  • Methylphenidate hydrochloride Ratiopharm
  • Methylphenidate hydrochloride Hexal

6.2. Food intake influences duration of action

Regardless of the need for the retarding effect of some MPH preparations and regardless of the influence on urine pH (in relation to amphetamine drugs) or gastric pH (in relation to MPH), certain forms of food intake influence the effect and duration of action of stimulants in a rather mechanical way.
Lisdexamfetamine (Vyvanse) has a maximum blood level that is delayed by one hour with high-fat meals (4.7 hours instead of 3.8 hours after ingestion).79 However, other parameters, such as the duration of action, do not change.

A person with ADHD reports:
“I have been taking Medikinet adult continuously for three months now and it took me a long time to find the right setting. In addition to the dose (20-10-0 for me), other food intake conditions have also been important for me. Too much food while taking it is problematic for me, as is too little. And I have a better effect if I eat something carbohydrate-heavy when I take it.”

6.3. Food intake delays maximum AMP levels

Lisdexamfetamine (Vyvanse) has a maximum blood level that is delayed by one hour with high-fat meals (4.7 hours instead of 3.8 hours after ingestion).79 However, other parameters, such as the duration of action, do not change.

6.4. Absorption of active ingredients

Some foods have the ability to absorb active ingredients and thus delay the onset and duration of action.
Example:

  • Psyllium seeds8081 , which is why it is recommended to take them half an hour to an hour apart from other medicines82

7. Physical activity / sports

Individual persons with ADHD report that intensive sports can shorten the duration of effect of stimulants by up to 40 %.83

8. Nicotine / Smoking

Several people with ADHD reported a change in the stimulant effect due to smoking.
Was reported (in each individual case as a special feature of stimulant use):

  • A person with ADHD reports:
    • increased nicotine craving 4 h after taking Vyvanse
    • somewhat listless and tired after the first cigarette of the day
    • A day without a cigarette and only with Vyvanse goes ok except for the restlessness caused by nicotine withdrawal, but motivation and effect is there until the afternoon/evening
    • Switching to nicotine “chewing gum” instead of smoking/vaping resulted in a significantly higher level of balance and no more tiredness at lunchtime
  • One person with ADHD described a drug-dependent effect:
    • Vyvanse + nicotine: weakened effect, negative feelings
    • MPH + nicotine enhanced effect, kick (at the same time greater fall/rebound)
  • An occasional smoker:
    • just one or two cigarettes can cause Vyvanse and MPH to stop working properly
    • it then takes a few days for them to work properly again
    • I usually sleep well with Vyvanse now. When I have smoked, I sleep worse.
    • the difference in the effect of Vyvanse when I have not smoked for a long time is enormous
  • A person with ADHD:
    • When I feel overwhelmed, I feel like smoking as a means of compensation or as a means of driving myself on.
    • It works at first, but after a few days it changes. I become less energetic and my mood deteriorates.
    • It doesn’t do me any good in the long term and it doesn’t go well with the medication. The effect gets worse and I end up feeling worse
  • A steamer:
    • After taking MPH, vaping causes me fatigue and headaches
    • Nicotine enhances the MPH effect

9. Alcohol

Alcohol can increase amphetamine levels.84

10. Cycle

The female cycle influences dopamine levels. Oestrogen influences COMT, which breaks down dopamine in the PFC.
People with ADHD with certain COMT gene variants are particularly susceptible.
The required stimulant dose may vary depending on the cycle phase.
When taking stimulants, women should always keep a corresponding observation sheet to record cycle fluctuations and the effects of the medication. This is the only way to recognize whether the dose of medication needs to be changed in certain phases of the cycle. The dosing aid table, which is available in the Download area of the adhs-forum.adxs.org facilitates the recording of medication intake, symptom development and cycle.

11. Liver function

11.1. Age

Hepatic metabolization can slow down with age, partly due to poorer blood flow to the liver.285

Reduced CYP metabolism in old age is known for the following psychotropic drugs:2425

  • Alprazolam (men only)
  • Chlordiazepoxide
  • Desipramine (men only)
  • Diazepam
  • Imipramine
  • Nortriptyline
  • Trazodone
  • Triazolam (men only)

Degradation is reduced by 30 to 40 % on average, but varies so much from individual to individual that, as with the dosage, each individual case must be considered.

11.2. Diseases

Diseases of the liver can (severely) restrict liver functionality. Reduced protein synthesis in the liver automatically reduces plasma protein binding, which weakens the breakdown of substances by the enzymes in the liver.
If bile production in the liver is restricted, the excretion of large molecules is reduced and the enterohepatic circulation is impaired.
Heart failure reduces liver blood flow.

11.3. First-pass effect

“The intestinal veins are led to the heart via the liver, so that a substance absorbed in the intestine undergoes a liver passage before it can be further distributed via the great vena cava and the heart. If a substance only survives this first passage through the liver to a small extent, this is referred to as a high first-pass effect. The result of this effect is that, despite good absorption, only small amounts of the active ingredient are available systemically. Due to the “first-pass effect”, substances can be quickly altered or inactivated in the liver (pre-systemic elimination).”29

The first-pass effect is also subject to individual differences.
From the age of 40, the first-pass effect decreases by around 1 % per year, so that blood serum levels are increased in older people at the same dose.2425

11.4. Smoking

Smoking can affect metabolization by liver enzymes.

12. Receptor sensitivity

Active pharmaceutical ingredients can bind to receptors, transporters, ion channels or enzymes and trigger effects there. The sensitivity of these receptor structures influences efficacy.
The sensitivity of the receiver structures can be influenced by variants of the genes coding for them.

Examples:

  • A combination of six polymorphisms in genes coding for the 5-HT2A, 5-HT2C, histamine H2 receptors and SERT predicted the response to clozapine in schizophrenia with a probability of almost 80%86
  • Lack of effect of tamoxifen in breast cancer in the absence of estrogen receptor expression87
  • An influence of the DAT gene on the MPH response is discussed for ADHD medications
  • If the blood D3 level is sufficient, reduced sensitive receptors can nevertheless cause a D3 deficiency

13. Blood-brain barrier: Crossing into the brain

The blood-brain barrier seals blood vessels in the brain very tightly against the uncontrolled exchange of substances into the brain. As far as possible, only a controlled exchange via transporters and vesicles should take place.
The blood-brain barrier comprises a number of physiological properties that must be either induced (tight junctions, transporters, metabolic enzymes) or inhibited (transcytosis, LAM) in the endothelial cells of the brain compared to those in the body88
A basic introduction to the blood-brain barrier in German can be found at Psysiologie.cc89, in English at Daneman, Prat.88

Example:

  • P-glycoprotein (MDR1 gene): controls the transfer of drugs into the brain
    • MDR1 gene variants influence its efficacy. Reduced MDR1 function weakens the blood-brain barrier, drugs can increasingly enter the brain, which can increase their effect even though the blood plasma level is unchanged.87

Imbalances in the gut microbiome can affect the blood-brain barrier and thus impair the brain’s protection against toxins, pathogens or the supply of nutrients. More on this at Gut-brain axis and ADHD in the chapter Development

More about the blood-brain barrier at Blood-brain barrier and ADHD In the chapter Development

14. Metabolizing enzymes: Degradation

Many drugs are broken down by enzymes, primarily in the liver.
Some active ingredients are only formed through a prior enzymatic conversion of drugs.
Strength of action: Depending on the gene variant, the enzyme encoded by the gene is synthesized to a greater or lesser extent, which influences the degradation capacity.
Competition: If several drugs are taken that are broken down by the same enzyme, they compete for the enzyme that breaks them down, which prolongs the duration of action of these drugs and increases side effects.
In addition, there are active ingredients that inhibit (inhibitors) or promote (inducers) an enzyme, which influences their effectiveness in terms of drug degradation accordingly.

Metabolic enzymes catalyze two types of biotransformation reactions in humans87

  • Phase 1 reactions:
    • Functionalization reactions
      • Oxidation, reduction, hydrolysis and hydration
    • Mode of action:
      • Introduction of functional group(s) (e.g. a hydroxyl group) into the non-polar molecule or
      • Exposure of corresponding functional groups
  • Phase 2 reactions
    • Conjugation reactions
      • Glucuronidation, sulfation, methylation, acetylation and conjugation with amino acids and glutathione
    • Mode of action:
      • Coupling of functional groups with very polar, negatively charged endogenous molecules (e.g. glucuronic acid)

In the following, we will only deal with those enzymes that concern ADHD medications. However, this already covers the most important enzymes.
CYP3A4 (guanfacine) breaks down 40 to 50 % of all drugs.
CYP2D6 (amphetamine drugs, atomoxetine) breaks down around 25 % of all drugs.

14.1. Degradation increased / decreased depending on metabolization enzyme gene variant

The degradation of active ingredients or neurotransmitters is influenced by how active the gene variant is that expresses the protein that synthesizes their metabolizing enzymes. Some gene variants cause increased or excessive protein production, while others cause reduced or no protein production.
In carriers of the COMT Val-158 Met gene polymorphism, amphetamine increased the efficiency of the PFC in subjects with presumably low levels of dopamine in the PFC. In contrast, in carriers of the COMT Met-158-Met polymorphism, amphetamine had no effect on cortical efficiency at low to moderate working memory load and caused a deterioration at high working memory load. Individuals with the Met-158-Met polymorphism appear to be at increased risk for an adverse response to amphetamine.90

14.1.1. ADHD active ingredients and their main degradation enzymes

ADHD active ingredients are broken down by different enzymes:

Methylphenidate: CES1
Amphetamine drugs: CYP2D6 (also strongly dependent on pH value)
Atomoxetine: CYP2D6
Bupropion: CYP2B687 and something about CYP2A6
Guanfacine: CYP3A4
Clonidine: unknown
Buspirone: CYP3A4
Memantine: unknown, probably not through CYP40
Viloxazine: CYP2D6, UGT1A9, UGT2B15, possibly also by CYP1A2
Melatonin: CYP1A
Dasotraline: unknown
Agomelatine: CYP1A2 (90 %), CYP2C9/2C19 (10 %)

See the comprehensive articles on the metabolizing enzymes of the respective ADHD medications:

CES1 Metabolizing enzyme:

  • Methylphenidate (MPH)

CYP2D6 Metabolizing enzyme:

  • Amphetamine medication (AMP)
  • Atomoxetine
  • Bupropion: CYP2B687 and slightly above CYP2A6, but strong CYP2D6 inhibitor

CYP3A4 Metabolizing enzyme:

  • Guanfacine
  • Buspirone

14.1.2. Pharmacogenetic diagnostics

The gene variants of metabolization enzymes can be determined by genetic testing.91

Suitable laboratories can be found by searching for laboratory CES1 (for MPH) or laboratory CYP2D6 (amphetamine drugs, atomoxetine). In Germany, the laboratory service can be billed via health insurance companies if it has been prescribed by a doctor.

A laboratory diagnosis of the 22 most important metabolization genes (including the POR gene, which is important for the CYP gene family) cost around €600 as of September 2023.
A sample diagnostic report can be found at CeGaT, a provider of genetic diagnostics in Tübingen.92 Genetic analyses of individual metabolization genes were around € 300 in September 2023.

14.2. Competition for mining and cross effects

The effect of drugs can be influenced by their degradation enzymes in various ways.

Risk:
The mechanisms of competition, inhibition, induction or influencing gene expression described below must be taken into account when planning medication. Disregarding them represents a risk or even a treatment error. A new medication can influence the effect of an existing medication (and vice versa), resulting in a risk of loss of efficacy and/or overdose of the new or existing medication(s).

Benefit:
However, the same paths of action can also be used in a planned way and then have a helpful effect.
However, a deliberate combination of competing, inhibiting or genetically regulating drugs can be helpful in improving the effectiveness of individual drugs. For example, drugs that are administered at the same time can be dosed with the appropriate caution or emphasis if the interactions are taken into account. The deliberate use of such combinations is also possible, for example to improve the effect in super-rapid metabolizers or to improve degradation in slow metabolizers.
Example: A person with ADHD who metabolized a dose of Vyvanse in 5-6 hours, reported to us that a combination with 150 mg bupropion very helpfully prolonged the duration of action of Vyvanse. Vyvanse is metabolized via CYP2D6; bupropion genetically inhibits CYP2D6.

14.2.1. Competition

Competition from other substrates: If several active ingredients bind to the same enzyme (substrates) and are degraded by it, they compete for the available amount of degradation enzymes when administered at the same time. This can delay degradation.

14.2.2. Inhibition

Inhibition: Drugs can hinder (inhibit) the action of enzymes, even if they are broken down by completely different enzymes

14.2.3. Induction

Induction: Drugs can enhance (induce) the effect of enzymes

14.2.4. Genetic regulation

Genetic regulation: Drug substances can also influence metabolization enzymes through genetic regulation.
For example, bupropion is only a rather weak inhibitor of CYP2D6 in vitro. In vivo, however, bupropion strongly inhibits CYP2D6 because it also causes genetic downregulation of CYP2D6 mRNA.93

15. Excretion: Renal blood flow

Since amphetamine is excreted via the kidneys, the renal blood flow plays a minor but measurable role in the duration of effect in addition to the total dose.5
Another Consequences of this is that amphetamine blood levels change more slowly and are less prone to rebound than with methylphenidate,5

The glomerular filtration rate decreases on average by 8 ml/min/1.73 m²/decade (0.1 ml/s/m²/decade) from the age of 40. There are considerable individual differences.
Serum creatinine levels often remain within the normal range in old age despite a decrease in glomerular filtration rate, due to decreased muscle mass and reduced physical activity, so that serum creatinine levels in old age no longer reflect normal renal function. The breakdown of psychotropic drugs excreted by the kidneys is reduced in old age:2425

  • Brexpiprazole
  • Lurasidone
  • Paliperidone
  • Risperidone

16. Gene variants and response

A GWAS found influences of various genes on the response to MPH and ATX:94

  • on chromosome 12, SNP: rs10880574, in the 5-prime UTR intron region of the gene TMEM117 (transmembrane protein 117). TMEM117 is found in the plasma membrane and is also involved in the intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in the response to stress in the endoplasmic reticulum.
  • on chromosome 18, SNP: rs2000900. closest gene: MYO5B (myosin 5 B), which is involved in vesicular transport and is required in a complex with RAB11A and RAB11FIP2 for the transport of NPC1L1 to the plasma membrane. MYO5B is mainly expressed in digestive organs and plays a role in metabolic processes.
  • NKAIN2, an ADHD candidate gene
  • PUS7L
  • CTD-2561J22.3.

  1. Weih, Haen (2023): Therapeutisches Drug Monitoring in der Psychiatrie; NeuroTransmitter 2023; 34 (7-8), S. 25 - 29; deutsch

  2. Le (2022): Übersicht Pharmakokinetik; MSD manuals deutsch

  3. Le (2022): Übersicht Pharmakokinetik; MSD manuals englisch

  4. Rodden (2021): Short-Acting Stimulants Vs. Long-Acting Stimulants: Comparing ADHD Medications and Durations; Stand 14.09.2022

  5. Dodson WW (2005): Pharmacotherapy of adult ADHD. J Clin Psychol. 2005 May;61(5):589-606. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20122. PMID: 15723384. REVIEW

  6. Umfrage ADxS.org, n = 23; Stand 09.09.23

  7. Elbe, Black, McGrane, Procyshyn (Hrsg.) (2019): Clinical Handbook of Psychotrophic Drugs for Children and Adolescents, 4th edition

  8. https://www.kinderaerzte-im-netz.de/media/53ec94e833af614b730097d1/source/20080530092715_adhs2.pdf

  9. Medikamenteninformation des Herstellers Shire

  10. https://www.adhspedia.de/wiki/Medikamente

  11. Umfrage ADxS.org, n = 100; Stand 09.09.23

  12. Umfrage ADxS.org, n = 20; Stand 09.09.23

  13. Rodden (2021): Short-Acting Stimulants Vs. Long-Acting Stimulants: Comparing ADHD Medications and Durations; Stand14.09.2022

  14. Umfrage ADxS.org, n = 15; Stand 09.09.23

  15. Medikamenten-Fachinformation des Herstellers ratiopharm

  16. Fachinformation Gelbe Liste Methylphenidathydrochlorid Hexal

  17. Kohns (2019): Arzneimittel in der Therapie der Aufmerksamkeitsdefizit-/Hyperaktivitätsstörung (ADHS), neue Akzente 3/19

  18. https://www.adhspedia.de/wiki/Ritalin_Adult

  19. Boellner SW, Stark JG, Krishnan S, Zhang Y (2010): Pharmacokinetics of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate and its active metabolite, d-amphetamine, with increasing oral doses of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a single-dose, randomized, open-label, crossover study. Clin Ther. 2010 Feb;32(2):252-64. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.02.011. PMID: 20206783.

  20. Ermer J, Homolka R, Martin P, Buckwalter M, Purkayastha J, Roesch B (2010): Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate: linear dose-proportionality, low intersubject and intrasubject variability, and safety in an open-label single-dose pharmacokinetic study in healthy adult volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Sep;50(9):1001-10. doi: 10.1177/0091270009357346. PMID: 20173084.

  21. Dolder PC, Strajhar P, Vizeli P, Hammann F, Odermatt A, Liechti ME (2017): Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Lisdexamfetamine Compared with D-Amphetamine in Healthy Subjects. Front Pharmacol. 2017 Sep 7;8:617. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00617. PMID: 28936175; PMCID: PMC5594082.

  22. Information Takeda, 24.04.2024

  23. Hahn, Wolters (2001): Lebensmittel-Medikamenten-Interaktionen. in: LEXIKON DER ERNÄHRUNG. Spektrum.de. Abgerufen 28.01.23

  24. Ruscin, Linnebur (2021): Pharmakokinetik bei Älteren; MSD manuals deutsch

  25. Ruscin, Linnebur (2021): Pharmacokinetics in Older Adults; MSD manuals englisch

  26. Krabseth HM, Strømmen M, Helland A, Spigset O (2025): Effect of bariatric surgery on the pharmacokinetics of drugs used for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder-A case series. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2025 Jan;136(1):e14099. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.14099. PMID: 39497274; PMCID: PMC11655785.

  27. Jones (2022): Pharmakokinetik bei Kindern, MDS manuals deutsch

  28. Jones (2022): Pharmacokinetics in Children, MDS manuals englisch

  29. WikiBooks: Pharmakologie und Toxikologie: Pharmakokinetik, 26.01.2023

  30. Wisker (2010): Interaktionen zwischen Nahrung und Arzneimitteln; Ernährungs Umschau | 3/10

  31. ELLIOT JS, SHARP RF, LEWIS L (1959): Urinary pH. J Urol. 1959 Feb;81(2):339-43. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)66022-1. PMID: 13631832.

  32. Ernährung: Saurer Urin, Stiftung Warentest, 2005. german

  33. BECKETT AH, ROWLAND M, TURNER P (1965): INFLUENCE OF URINARY PH ON EXCRETION OF AMPHETAMINE. Lancet. 1965 Feb 6;1(7380):303. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(65)91033-0. PMID: 14247879.

  34. Kim I, Oyler JM, Moolchan ET, Cone EJ, Huestis MA (2004): Urinary pharmacokinetics of methamphetamine and its metabolite, amphetamine following controlled oral administration to humans. Ther Drug Monit. 2004 Dec;26(6):664-72. doi: 10.1097/00007691-200412000-00013. PMID: 15570192.

  35. Clarke, E. G. C. (Ed.). (1969). Isolation and identification of drugs (Vol. 1, pp. 192-193). London: Pharmaceutical press.

  36. Tekada Fachinformation Elvanse abgerufen 04.02.23

  37. Chan C, Sui W, Breeggemann MC, Stoller M (2025): Modulators of urinary pH in the context of urinary stone disease: a literature review. Transl Androl Urol. 2025 Aug 30;14(8):2428-2438. doi: 10.21037/tau-2025-275. Epub 2025 Aug 26. PMID: 40949433; PMCID: PMC12433178. REVIEW

  38. Kämmerer W (2024): Comparative pharmacology and abuse potential of oral dexamphetamine and lisdexamfetamine-A literature review. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2024 Jul 18:e2910. doi: 10.1002/hup.2910. PMID: 39024047. REVIEW

  39. Osuna-Padilla IA, Leal-Escobar G, Garza-García CA, Rodríguez-Castellanos FE (2019): Dietary Acid Load: mechanisms and evidence of its health repercussions. Nefrologia (Engl Ed). 2019 Jul-Aug;39(4):343-354. English, Spanish. doi: 10.1016/j.nefro.2018.10.005. PMID: 30737117. REVIEW

  40. Memantine Merz, ANHANG I, ZUSAMMENFASSUNG DER MERKMALE DES ARZNEIMITTELS

  41. Huang W, Czuba LC, Isoherranen N (2020): Mechanistic PBPK Modeling of Urine pH Effect on Renal and Systemic Disposition of Methamphetamine and Amphetamine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2020 Jun;373(3):488-501. doi: 10.1124/jpet.120.264994. PMID: 32198137; PMCID: PMC7250368.

  42. Aresti-Sanz J, Schwalbe M, Pereira RR, Permentier H, El Aidy S (2021): Stability of Methylphenidate under Various pH Conditions in the Presence or Absence of Gut Microbiota. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021 Jul 27;14(8):733. doi: 10.3390/ph14080733. PMID: 34451830; PMCID: PMC8398889.

  43. Yang X, Morris SM, Gearhart JM, Ruark CD, Paule MG, Slikker W Jr, Mattison DR, Vitiello B, Twaddle NC, Doerge DR, Young JF, Fisher JW (2014): Development of a physiologically based model to describe the pharmacokinetics of methylphenidate in juvenile and adult humans and nonhuman primates. PLoS One. 2014 Sep 3;9(9):e106101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106101. PMID: 25184666; PMCID: PMC4153582.

  44. Yang X, Duan J, Fisher J (2016): Application of Physiologically Based Absorption Modeling to Characterize the Pharmacokinetic Profiles of Oral Extended Release Methylphenidate Products in Adults. PLoS One. 2016 Oct 10;11(10):e0164641. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164641. PMID: 27723791; PMCID: PMC5056674.

  45. Sui W, Miller NL, Gould ER, Zhang KC, Koyama T, Hsi RS (2022): Proton pump inhibitors use and risk of incident nephrolithiasis. Urolithiasis. 2022 Aug;50(4):401-409. doi: 10.1007/s00240-022-01326-1. PMID: 35499617.

  46. Zieglmaier (2014): Methylphenidat bei Erwachsenen. Was ist bei der Therapie zu beachten? DAZ.ONLINE DAZ / AZ DAZ 44/2014

  47. Cook JD, Strauss KA, Caplan YH, Lodico CP, Bush DM (2007): Urine pH: the effects of time and temperature after collection. J Anal Toxicol. 2007 Oct;31(8):486-96. doi: 10.1093/jat/31.8.486. PMID: 17988463.

  48. Alguacil J, Kogevinas M, Silverman DT, Malats N, Real FX, García-Closas M, Tardón A, Rivas M, Torà M, García-Closas R, Serra C, Carrato A, Pfeiffer RM, Fortuny J, Samanic C, Rothman N (2011): Urinary pH, cigarette smoking and bladder cancer risk. Carcinogenesis. 2011 Jun;32(6):843-7. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgr048. PMID: 21402590; PMCID: PMC3106435.

  49. Guiol C, Montastruc P, Prévost MC (1986): Renal effect of acute hypobaric pressure breathing in normal and diabetes insipidus rats. J Physiol (Paris). 1986;81(1):41-4. PMID: 3761205.

  50. Beara-Lasic L, Goldfarb DS (2020): Nephrolithiasis in women: how different from men? Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2020 Mar;29(2):201-206. doi: 10.1097/MNH.0000000000000577. PMID: 31789849. REVIEW

  51. Menezes CJ, Worcester EM, Coe FL, Asplin J, Bergsland KJ, Ko B (2019): Mechanisms for falling urine pH with age in stone formers. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2019 Jul 1;317(7):F65-F72. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00066.2019. PMID: 31017011; PMCID: PMC6692718.

  52. Otto BJ, Bozorgmehri S, Kuo J, Canales M, Bird VG, Canales B (2017): Age, Body Mass Index, and Gender Predict 24-Hour Urine Parameters in Recurrent Idiopathic Calcium Oxalate Stone Formers. J Endourol. 2017 Dec;31(12):1335-1341. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0352. PMID: 29084490.

  53. Taylor GO, Oyediran AB, Adesina HA (1979): The effect of seasonal changes and socio-economic status on urinary pH and specific gravity. Trop Geogr Med. 1979 Mar;31(1):105-10. PMID: 39374.

  54. Zechner O, Latal D, Pflüger H, Scheiber V (1981): Die soziale Infrastruktur von Harnsteinpatienten [The social infrastructure of patients with urinary calculi (author’s transl)]. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1981 Oct 30;93(20):635-8. German. PMID: 7324475.

  55. Barclay H, Mukerji S, Kayser B, O’Donnell T, Tzeng YC, Hill S, Knapp K, Legg S, Frei D, Fan JL (2021): Respiratory alkalinization and posterior cerebral artery dilatation predict acute mountain sickness severity during 10 h normobaric hypoxia. Exp Physiol. 2021 Jan;106(1):175-190. doi: 10.1113/EP088938. PMID: 33347666.

  56. Kass MA, Kolker AE, Gordon M, Goldberg I, Gieser DK, Krupin T, Becker B (1981): Acetazolamide and urolithiasis. Ophthalmology. 1981 Mar;88(3):261-5. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(81)35041-6. PMID: 7231915.

  57. Drewa T, Wolski Z, Gruszka M, Misterek B, Lysik J (2007): Uric acid plasma level and urine pH in rats treated with ambroxol. Acta Pol Pharm. 2007 Nov-Dec;64(6):565-7. PMID: 18323253.

  58. Nazzal L, Francois F, Henderson N, Liu M, Li H, Koh H, Wang C, Gao Z, Perez GP, Asplin JR, Goldfarb DS, Blaser MJ (2021): Effect of antibiotic treatment on Oxalobacter formigenes colonization of the gut microbiome and urinary oxalate excretion. Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 12;11(1):16428. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95992-7. PMID: 34385560; PMCID: PMC8361114.

  59. Siener R (2016): Can the manipulation of urinary pH by beverages assist with the prevention of stone recurrence? Urolithiasis. 2016 Feb;44(1):51-6. doi: 10.1007/s00240-015-0844-7. PMID: 26614113. REVIEW

  60. Biolo G, Di Girolamo FG, Heer M, Sturma M, Mazzucco S, Agostini F, Situlin R, Vinci P, Giordano M, Buehlmeier J, Frings-Meuthen P, Mearelli F, Fiotti N (2019): Alkalinization with potassium bicarbonate improves glutathione status and protein kinetics in young volunteers during 21-day bed rest. Clin Nutr. 2019 Apr;38(2):652-659. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.04.006. PMID: 29739680.

  61. Cao C, Li F, Ding Q, Jin X, Tu W, Zhu H, Sun M, Zhu J, Yang D, Fan B (2024): Potassium sodium hydrogen citrate intervention on gut microbiota and clinical features in uric acid stone patients. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2024 Dec;108(1):51. doi: 10.1007/s00253-023-12953-y. PMID: 38183479; PMCID: PMC10771603.

  62. Classen HG, Fischer G, Marx J, Schimatschek H, Schmid C, Stein C (1987): Prevention of stress-induced damage in experimental animals and livestock by monomagnesium-L-aspartate hydrochloride. Magnesium. 1987;6(1):34-9. PMID: 3821173.

  63. Nahok K, Phetcharaburanin J, Li JV, Silsirivanit A, Thanan R, Boonnate P, Joonhuathon J, Sharma A, Anutrakulchai S, Selmi C, Cha’on U (2021): Monosodium Glutamate Induces Changes in Hepatic and Renal Metabolic Profiles and Gut Microbiome of Wistar Rats. Nutrients. 2021 May 30;13(6):1865. doi: 10.3390/nu13061865. PMID: 34070818; PMCID: PMC8229789.

  64. Fukushima S, Uwagawa S, Shirai T, Hasegawa R, Ogawa K (1990): Synergism by sodium L-ascorbate but inhibition by L-ascorbic acid for sodium saccharin promotion of rat two-stage bladder carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 1990 Jul 15;50(14):4195-8. PMID: 2364375.

  65. Baia Lda C, Baxmann AC, Moreira SR, Holmes RP, Heilberg IP (2012): Noncitrus alkaline fruit: a dietary alternative for the treatment of hypocitraturic stone formers. J Endourol. 2012 Sep;26(9):1221-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0092. PMID: 22500592.

  66. Ghorbe F, Boujelbene M, Makni-Ayadi F, Guermazi F, Kammoun A, Murat J, Croute F, Soleilhavoup JP, El-Feki A (2001): Effect of chronic lead exposure on kidney function in male and female rats: determination of a lead exposure biomarker. Arch Physiol Biochem. 2001 Dec;109(5):457-63. doi: 10.1076/apab.109.5.457.8035. PMID: 11935388.

  67. Schneider SN, Liu Z, Wang B, Miller ML, Afton SE, Soleimani M, Nebert DW (2014): Oral cadmium in mice carrying 5 versus 2 copies of the Slc39a8 gene: comparison of uptake, distribution, metal content, and toxicity. Int J Toxicol. 2014 Jan-Feb;33(1):14-20. doi: 10.1177/1091581813513530. PMID: 24345748.

  68. Arphorn S, Manothum A, Santiwung K, Pangunta K, Hara K, Ishimaru T (2021): Working Conditions and Urinalysis Dipstick Testing among Female Rice Farmers: A Preliminary Cross-Sectional Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 25;18(17):8942. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18178942. PMID: 34501531; PMCID: PMC8430999.

  69. García-Trabanino R, Jarquín E, Wesseling C, Johnson RJ, González-Quiroz M, Weiss I, Glaser J, José Vindell J, Stockfelt L, Roncal C, Harra T, Barregard L (2015): Heat stress, dehydration, and kidney function in sugarcane cutters in El Salvador–A cross-shift study of workers at risk of Mesoamerican nephropathy. Environ Res. 2015 Oct;142:746-55. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2015.07.007. PMID: 26209462.

  70. Wesseling C, Aragón A, González M, Weiss I, Glaser J, Rivard CJ, Roncal-Jiménez C, Correa-Rotter R, Johnson RJ (2016): Heat stress, hydration and uric acid: a cross-sectional study in workers of three occupations in a hotspot of Mesoamerican nephropathy in Nicaragua. BMJ Open. 2016 Dec 8;6(12):e011034. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011034. Erratum in: BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 25;7(1):e011034corr1. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011034corr1. PMID: 27932336; PMCID: PMC5168614.

  71. Masterson JH, Jourdain VJ, Collard DA, Choe CH, Christman MS, L’Esperance JO, Auge BK (2013): Changes in urine parameters after desert exposure: assessment of stone risk in United States Marines transiently exposed to a desert environment. J Urol. 2013 Jan;189(1):165-70. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.097. PMID: 23174258.

  72. Lee J, Chang HK, Lee S (2020): Association of low urine pH as a metabolic feature with abdominal obesity. J Int Med Res. 2020 Jan;48(1):300060519898615. doi: 10.1177/0300060519898615. PMID: 31992101; PMCID: PMC7113708.

  73. Fellström B, Danielson BG, Karlström B, Lithell H, Ljunghall S, Vessby B, Wide L (1984): Effects of high intake of dietary animal protein on mineral metabolism and urinary supersaturation of calcium oxalate in renal stone formers. Br J Urol. 1984 Jun;56(3):263-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1984.tb05384.x. PMID: 6544608.

  74. Cosgrove K, Johnston CS (2017): Examining the Impact of Adherence to a Vegan Diet on Acid-Base Balance in Healthy Adults. Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 2017 Sep;72(3):308-313. doi: 10.1007/s11130-017-0620-7. PMID: 28677099.

  75. Passey C (2017): Reducing the Dietary Acid Load: How a More Alkaline Diet Benefits Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease. J Ren Nutr. 2017 May;27(3):151-160. doi: 10.1053/j.jrn.2016.11.006. PMID: 28117137 REVIEW

  76. Vormann (2021): Ausführliche PRAL-Tabelle zu Wunderwaffe Basenfood

  77. Remer T, Manz F (1995): Potential renal acid load of foods and its influence on urine pH. J Am Diet Assoc. 1995 Jul;95(7):791-7. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(95)00219-7. PMID: 7797810.

  78. Passey C (2017): Reducing the Dietary Acid Load: How a More Alkaline Diet Benefits Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease. J Ren Nutr. 2017 May;27(3):151-160. doi: 10.1053/j.jrn.2016.11.006. PMID: 28117137 REVIEW

  79. Shire (2018): Fachinformation Elvanse

  80. Drugs.com: Psyllium

  81. Beipackzettel Zirkulin Flohsamen german

  82. Gebrauchsinformation Flohsamen Aurica german

  83. https://adhs-forum.adxs.org/t/medi-wirkdauer-bei-sport/11700

  84. Schoretsanitis, de Leon, Eap, Kane, Paulzen (2019): Clinically Significant Drug-Drug Interactions with Agents for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. CNS Drugs. 2019 Dec;33(12):1201-1222. doi: 10.1007/s40263-019-00683-7.

  85. Le (2022): Overview of Pharmacokinetics; MSD manuals englisch

  86. Arranz MJ, Collier D, Kerwin RW (2001): Pharmacogenetics for the individualization of psychiatric treatment. Am J Pharmacogenomics. 2001;1(1):3-10. doi: 10.2165/00129785-200101010-00001. PMID: 12173312.

  87. Schwab, Matthias; Marx, Claudia; Zanger, Ulrich M.; Eichelbaum, Michel; Fischer-Bosch, Margarete (2002): Pharmakogenetik der Zytochrom-P-450-Enzyme: Bedeutung für Wirkungen und Nebenwirkungen von Medikamenten. Dtsch Arztebl 2002; 99(8): A-497 / B-400 / C-377

  88. Daneman R, Prat A (2015): The blood-brain barrier. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015 Jan 5;7(1):a020412. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a020412. PMID: 25561720; PMCID: PMC4292164. REVIEW

  89. Hinghofer-Szalkay: Blut-Hirn-Schranke

  90. Mattay, Goldberg, Fera, Hariri, Tessitore, Egan, Kolachana, Callicott, Weinberger (2003): Catechol O-methyltransferase val158-met genotype and individual variation in the brain response to amphetamine; doi: 10.1073/pnas.0931309100; PNAS May 13, 2003 vol. 100 no. 10 6186-6191

  91. Kein, Grau (2001): Arzneimittelnebenwirkungen vermeiden: Möglichkeiten der pharmakogenetischen Diagnostik. J Lab Med 2001; 25 (11/12): 477-484

  92. Muster-Diagnosebericht Metabolisierungs-Genanalyse

  93. Sager JE, Tripathy S, Price LS, Nath A, Chang J, Stephenson-Famy A, Isoherranen N (2017): In vitro to in vivo extrapolation of the complex drug-drug interaction of bupropion and its metabolites with CYP2D6; simultaneous reversible inhibition and CYP2D6 downregulation. Biochem Pharmacol. 2017 Jan 1;123:85-96. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2016.11.007. Erratum in: Biochem Pharmacol. 2021 Jan;183:114306. PMID: 27836670; PMCID: PMC5164944.

  94. Zhao Y, Fu Z, Barnett EJ, Wang N, Zhang K, Gao X, Zheng X, Tian J, Zhang H, Ding X, Li S, Li S, Cao Q, Chang S, Wang Y, Faraone SV, Yang L (2025): Genome data based deep learning identified new genes predicting pharmacological treatment response of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Transl Psychiatry. 2025 Feb 7;15(1):46. doi: 10.1038/s41398-025-03250-5. PMID: 39920114; PMCID: PMC11806042.

Diese Seite wurde am 25.11.2025 zuletzt aktualisiert.