Dear reader of ADxS.org, please excuse the disruption.

ADxS.org needs around €58,500 in 2024. Unfortunately 99,8 % of our readers do not donate. If everyone reading this appeal made a small contribution, our fundraising campaign for 2024 would be over after a few days. This appeal is displayed 23,000 times a week, but only 75 people donate. If you find ADxS.org useful, please take a minute to support ADxS.org with your donation. Thank you very much!

Since 01.06.2021 ADxS.org is supported by the non-profit ADxS e.V. Donations to ADxS e.V. are tax-deductible in Germany (up to €300, the remittance slip is sufficient as a donation receipt).

If you would prefer to make an active contribution, you can find ideas for Participation or active support here.

$45213 of $63500 - as of 2024-10-31
71%
Header Image
Impulsivity in ADHD - neurophysiological correlates

Sitemap

Impulsivity in ADHD - neurophysiological correlates

1. What impulsivity correlates with

Impulsiveness correlates with:

  • Externalizing rather than internalizing mental health problems1
  • Less sleep at weekends2
  • A lower affinity for food after the Mediterranean diet2
  • Use of technical devices for more than 3 hours/day2
  • Birth by caesarean section2
  • Birth weight of more than 2.5 kg2
  • Not breastfed2
  • Sports on more than 3 days / week (low correlation)2
  • Tendency towards risky behavior3

With the exception of birth circumstances and breastfeeding, we believe that the correlations are more likely to be consequences than causes of impulsivity.
Causal links could exist with regard to the perception of time and reward discounting.

  • Faster subjective perception of time

One hypothesis explains impulsivity symptoms of ADHD with inter-individual differences in the perception of time of people with ADHD.45 According to this hypothesis, people with ADHD have a consistently different internal clock. The speed of cognitive functions based on temporal processing is increased. As a result, time passes subjectively faster for people with ADHD than for those not affected, so that real time is perceived as “sluggish”. This disorder in the subjective perception of time could explain the increased avoidance of delays, the greater perception of boredom, the unpleasant perception of waiting times and the devaluation of distant rewards. The time estimation of children with ADHD was even worse when they had particularly high impulsivity.6
We consider this to be a misinterpretation. If time passes subjectively faster, the distant reward should become relatively more valuable compared to those who are not affected, as the reward subjectively occurs earlier.
Addiction research also reports a correlation between impulsivity and a devaluation of more distant rewards, which is attributed to an altered perception of time.7

  • Devaluation of more distant rewards

Faster subjective time in ADHD inevitably leads to an additional reduction in the subjective value of delayed rewards, as the perceived temporal distance between present and future time points increases.
However, there appears to be a more direct link between the devaluation of more distant rewards and impulsivity. Impulsivity and delay aversion appear to correlate with timing skills.ERROR_UNKNOWN_FOOTNOTE: Subjective time perception can be experimentally assessed using hyperbolic delay discounting procedures to model the influence of time perception on decision making. Hyperbolic delay discounting describes the tendency (known from ADHD) to prefer smaller immediate rewards over larger but delayed rewards.5 This method thus assumes a direct link between the devaluation of more distant rewards and impulsivity.
Addiction research also reports a correlation between impulsivity and a devaluation of more distant rewards, which is attributed to an altered perception of time.7

2. Neurophysiological correlates of impulsivity

Impulsivity is associated with activity in a network of orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) → striatum → thalamus.8

2.1. Neurophysiological correlates

Atomoxetine had a stronger effect on action impulsivity than on choice impulsivity in rodents, which was taken as an indication that these are neurophysiologically different constructs.9

2.1.1. Neurophysiological correlates of impulsivity in general

Impulsivity correlates with higher activity in the following brain regions:

  • Ventral amygdala (both sides)1011
  • Parahippocampal gyrus10
  • Left dorsal anterior cingulum (Brodmann area 32)10
  • Caudate nucleus (both sides)10

Impulsivity correlates with lower activity in the following brain regions:

  • Dorsal amygdala10
  • Ventral PFC (Brodmann area 47)10
  • Cingulum
  • Right medial frontal gyrus12
  • Right precentral gyrus12
  • Right frontal pole14

Impulse inhibition correlates neurologically with

  • Increased activity in the orbitomedial PFC (omPFC)
  • Reduced dopaminergic excitation of the omPFC
    • Reduces the ability to inhibit impulsivity.15
  • Increased activity in the right (anterior lateral) obitofrontal cortex (OFC)1611 or dorsolateral PFC.17
  • Right middle frontal gyrus and right inferior frontal gyrus:18
    • reduced activation in the right PFC Children with ADHD-I
    • tendency towards increased activation in children with ADHD-C
  • Temporal gyrus and the supplementary motor area:18
    • Activation impaired in children with ADHD-I and ADHD-C

One study found no evidence of abnormalities in neurocognitive processes as represented by the diffusion decision model (DDM) or in go/no-go performance in ADHD. However, responses to failed inhibition in brain regions associated with error monitoring correlated closely with more efficient task performance, externalizing behavior, and ADHD symptoms. This study thus sows doubt as to whether go/no-go task activation truly reflects the neural basis of inhibition and found evidence that error-related contrasts provide better information.19

An FMRI-BOLD study using a Continuous Performance Task with visual and auditory distraction found in children with ADHD:20

  • reduced inhibitory activity in the audiovisual association zones
  • overactivation of the motor areas
  • cerebellar activation that attempted to modulate the responses of the different areas

which in sum led to an executive failure.

2.1.2. Neurophysiological correlates of action impulsivity

Neurophysiologically, inhibition problems are modulated by a circuit consisting of:21

  • pre-supplementary motor area (preSMA)
  • right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG)
  • Striatum
  • subthalamic nucleus (STN).

Action impulsivity and choice impulsivity are moderated by the genes for:21

  • D4R
  • DAT
  • COMT
  • α2AR

2.1.3. Neurophysiological correlates of elective impulsivity

Choice Impulsivity (Delay Disounting) is modulated by a brain circuit consisting of21

  • ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC)
    • glutamatergic neurons
  • posterior cingulate cortex (pCC)
    • glutamatergic neurons
  • Nucleus accumbens (NAc)

Action impulsivity and choice impulsivity are moderated by the genes for:21

  • D4R
  • DAT
  • COMT
    • A COMT inhibitor increased the choice of more distant rewards (in healthy subjects). This leads to impairments of the striatum. Since COMT degrades dopamine in the PFC, this suggests a correlation of reduced dopamine levels in the PFC and devaluation of distant rewards 15
  • α2AR

In SHR, in vivo electrophysiological recordings revealed neural coding of discounting behavior in the prefrontal and orbitofrontal cortex in the presence of rewards:22

  • OFC neurons
    • were activated regardless of the value of the reward
    • showed significantly higher neuronal discharge rates
    • the reward-predicting OFC neurons
      • coded the value of the rewards in control animals
      • were strongly activated at SHR after receiving a small direct amplifier
  • mPFC neurons
    • for large rewards: similarly active as for controls
    • for smaller rewards: higher discharge rates than for controls
    • no reaction to the value of the rewards

Delay discounting in ADHD correlated with:14

  • significant increase in the concentration of oxygenated hemoglobin (oxy-Hb) bilaterally in the frontal pole and in the dlPFC
  • Activity of the left PFC

2.2. Overexpression of the ATXN7 gene

Hyperactivity and impulsivity are also caused by overexpression of the Atxn7 gene in the PFC and striatum.23 In this case, atomoxetine was able to eliminate the hyperactivity and impulsivity.

2.3. Reduced HTR7 gene expression

The Htr7 gene, which expresses type 7 serotonin (5-hydroxy-tryptamine) receptors, mediates self-control behavior:24
A significant increase in Htr7 expression was found (mainly in the nucleus accumbens) in adult rats that had received MPH during adolescence. This correlated with a significant reduction in basal behavioral impulsivity.
A selective Htr7 antagonist prevented the reduction of impulsivity by MPH and increased impulsivity when given without prior MPH administration.
The mixed Htr(1a/7) agonist, 8-OH-DPAT, reduced impulsive behavior in adolescent rats and in naive adults whose impulsivity was enhanced by the Htr7 antagonist.

2.4. Amygdala

The connectivity of the brain networks is increased locally around the amygdala and decreased to the anterior cingulate and posterior cingulate in the cortex. The predominance of connections around the amygdala over cortical connections results in an increased impulsive response to stimuli with reduced cortical inhibition.13

Delay aversion (impatience) correlates with a reduced amygdala.25

2.5. Ventral striatum

A study on monkeys came to the conclusion that low doses of MPH reduce impulsivity, while higher doses have a sedative effect. The impulsivity-inhibiting effect occurred in the ventral striatum in particular.26
This follows on from empirical experience that people with ADHD, especially children, can sometimes appear apathetic when taking MPH. In our opinion, following this study, this indicates an overdose.

2.6. Increased connectivity between ventral tegmentum and middle cingulum

One study found a correlation between subjectively perceived impulsivity and significantly increased functional connectivity between the ventral tegmentum and the middle cingulate during L-dopa administration.27

2.7. Reduced myo-inositol levels in the vlPFC, but not in the striatum

In rats with high impulsivity, a significant reduction in myo-inositol concentration was reported in the infralimbic PFC, but not in the striatum, compared to rats with low impulsivity. In the infralimbic PFC, significant reductions in transcript levels of key proteins involved in the synthesis and recycling of inositol (IMPase1) were also evident. Deactivation of IMPase1 in the infralimbic PFC increased impulsivity.28
Myo-inositol (cyclohexane-cis-1,2,3,5-trans-4,6-hexol) is the most common isomer of inositol (inositol = cyclohexanehexol, a hexavalent cyclic alcohol). It is an intracellular “second messenger”. Oral administration improves insulin resistance as well as fat and glucose metabolism and lowers androgen levels.29

2.8. Increased lateralization of the posterior thalamic radiation

A significantly higher lateralization of the posterior thalamic radiation (PTR) was found in children with ADHD. The lateralization of the PTR correlated with inhibition in healthy controls, but not in children with ADHD.30

2.9. Nucleus accumbens

In rodents, lesions of the nucleus accumbens or the basolateral amygdala lead to impulsive decisions, but not lesions of the ACC or the mPFC. Lesions of the OFC reduce impulsivity. Impulsive decisions could thus be the result of abnormal processing of reward size or a reduced effect of delayed reinforcement.
Rodents with a lesion of the nucleus accumbens perceive the size of rewards normally, but show a selective deficit in learning instrumental responses with delayed reinforcement. This may indicate that the nucleus accumbens is a reinforcement learning system that mediates the effects of delayed rewards.31

2.10. Iron content in the putamen

Elevated iron levels in the putamen correlated - not only in ADHD - with worsened inhibition32

2.11. No indication of parietal involvement

One study found no evidence of expected parietal modulation with an increased need for inhibition. However, this lack of modulation was mediated by individual ADHD symptom severity. A correlation between intraparietal sulcus (IPS) activity and events to be inhibited was evident in less severe ADHD symptoms. However, this correlation disappeared for more severe ADHD symptoms. Similarly, functional connectivity between the IPS and the right inferior frontal gyrus correlated with conditions of high inhibitory demand, while this correlation decreased with increasing symptom severity.33

2.12. No unique genes in GWAS

A genome-wide association study (GWAS) found no unique genes that coded for impulsivity based on stop signal task, i.e. go reaction time (GoRT), go reaction time variability (GoRT SD) and stop signal reaction time (SSRT).34
Nevertheless, GoRT SD and SSRT showed a significant and similar SNP heritability of 8.2%, indicating a genetic influence. However, the heritability seems to stem from a high number of genes. In Europeans, polygenic risk for ADHD was significantly associated with GoRT SD and polygenic risk for schizophrenia was associated with GoRT, while in East Asians, polygenic risk for schizophrenia was associated with SSRT.

3. Impulsivity and neurotransmitters / hormones

3.1. Dopamine

Impulsivity (as well as distractibility and depression) is characterized by1

  • A reduced tonic (long-lasting) dopamine level
    and
  • A reduced phasic (short-term) dopamine response to stimuli in the mesolimbic system.

The ADHD symptom of lack of inhibition of executive functions is caused dopaminergically by the basal ganglia (striatum, putamen), while the lack of inhibition of emotion regulation is caused noradenergically by the hippocampus.35 Therefore, the former is more amenable to dopaminergic treatment. Emotion regulation and affect control, on the other hand, are more amenable to noradrenergic treatment.

3.2. Serotonin

Other sources describe that impulsivity is induced by a lack of serotonin.3637 A low affinity of the serotonin transporter in platelets correlated with high impulsivity, while an increased SERT affinity correlated moderately with increased aggressiveness and externalizing behaviour. SERT expression had no influence. Serotonin availability in the synaptic cleft seems to depend more on the affinity than the number of SERTs. 38

Serotonin inhibits aggression, so a lack of serotonin (in conjunction with high testosterone and low cortisol levels) promotes aggression. More on this under ⇒ Aggression as a consequence of high testosterone with a simultaneously weakened cortisol response.

A high serotonin level in the PFC reduces aggression and impulsivity.3940414243
Zuckermann’s theory that impulsivity goes hand in hand with increased dopamine levels does not seem to be confirmed. Rather, Cloninger’s theory that impulsivity is promoted by low serotonin and low dopamine levels seems to be confirmed.44 Against the background of the inverted-U theory4546 , according to which low and high neurotransmitter levels in one area of the brain can cause very similar problems, these two possibilities should not be mutually exclusive,

One study found identical serotonin concentrations in platelets in children with and without ADHD, and no relation to attention problems or hyperactivity, but a positive correlation to impulsive behavior.47

We have observed that low doses (2 to 5 mg/day) of SSRIs (e.g. escitalopram) can rapidly improve impulsivity in ADHD-HI. There appears to be an immediate effect of serotonin, as the effect does not occur after several weeks, as it occurs as a consequence of downregulation of the 5-HT receptors when higher doses of SSRIs are administered as antidepressants (escitalopram: 10 to 20 mg / day). In this case, downregulation of the receptors should be avoided as far as possible, which is why the lowest dosage that is still helpful should be used.

3.3. Adenosine, cannabinoids

SHR rats, representing a model of ADHD-HI, responded to a cannabinoid CB1 receptor agonist with increased impulsivity (increased preference for short-term reward). This response was inhibited by a single dose of caffeine (a non-specific adenosine receptor antagonist), but was enhanced by chronic caffeine administration.48
In contrast, a cannabinoid antagonist reduced impulsivity and increased the preference for later, but larger rewards.48

3.4. Corticoids

The response inhibition improved by mild stress in healthy subjects in a stop-signal task is worsened by a mineralocorticoid antagonist.49
This indicates the involvement of mineralocorticoid receptors or the balance between mineralocorticoid receptors and glucocorticoid receptors during inhibition.

4. Lack of sleep impairs inhibition

ADHD correlates with sleep deprivation. An increase in sleep duration significantly improved inhibition in children with ADHD.50


  1. Zisner, Beauchaine (2016): Neural substrates of trait impulsivity, anhedonia, and irritability: Mechanisms of heterotypic comorbidity between externalizing disorders and unipolar depression; Dev Psychopathol. 2016 Nov;28(4pt1):1177-1208

  2. San Mauro Martin, Sanz Rojo, Garicano Vilar, González Cosano, Conty de la Campa, Blumenfeld Olivares (2019): Lifestyle factors, diet and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in Spanish children – an observational study. Nutr Neurosci. 2019 Sep 3:1-10. doi: 10.1080/1028415X.2019.1660486.

  3. Ashare, Hawk (2012): Effects of smoking abstinence on impulsive behavior among smokers high and low in ADHD-like symptoms; Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2012 Jan; 219(2): 537–547. doi: 10.1007/s00213-011-2324-2, PMCID: PMC3184469, NIHMSID: NIHMS300102, PMID: 21559802, n = 56

  4. Ptacek, Weissenberger, Braaten, Klicperova-Baker, Goetz, Raboch, Vnukova, Stefano (2019): Clinical Implications of the Perception of Time in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): A Review. Med Sci Monit. 2019 May 26;25:3918-3924. doi: 10.12659/MSM.914225. PMID: 31129679; PMCID: PMC6556068. REVIEW

  5. White E, Dalley JW (2024): Brain mechanisms of temporal processing in impulsivity: Relevance to attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Brain Neurosci Adv. 2024 Aug 13;8:23982128241272234. doi: 10.1177/23982128241272234. PMID: 39148691; PMCID: PMC11325328. REVIEW

  6. González-Garrido AA, Gómez-Velázquez FR, Zarabozo D, López-Elizalde R, Ontiveros A, Madera-Carrillo H, Vega OL, De Alba JL, Tuya JM (2008): Time reproduction disturbances in ADHD children: an ERP study. Int J Neurosci. 2008 Jan;118(1):119-35. doi: 10.1080/00207450601042177. PMID: 18041610.

  7. Paasche C, Weibel S, Wittmann M, Lalanne L (2019): Time perception and impulsivity: A proposed relationship in addictive disorders. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Nov;106:182-201. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.12.006. PMID: 30529361. REVIEW

  8. Stahl (2013): Stahl’s Essential Psychopharmacology, 4. Auflage, Chapter 12: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and its treatment, Seite 474

  9. Kyriakidou M, Caballero-Puntiverio M, Andreasen JT, Thomsen M (2023): Relationship between two forms of impulsivity in mice at baseline and under acute and sub-chronic atomoxetine treatment. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2023 Aug 14:110841. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2023.110841. PMID: 37586638.

  10. Brown, Manuck, Flory, Hariri (2006): Neural Bases of individual differences in impulsivity: contributions of corticolimbic circuits for behavioral arousal and control. Emotion. 2006 May;6(2):239-45.

  11. New, Hazlett, Buchsbaum, Goodman, Mitelman, Newmark, Trisdorfer, Haznedar, Koenigsberg, Flory, Siever (2007): Amygdala-prefrontal disconnection in borderline personality disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2007 Jul;32(7):1629-40.

  12. Wingenfeld, Rullkoetter, Mensebach, Beblo, Mertens, Kreisel, Toepper, Driessen, Woermann (2009): Neural correlates of the individual emotional Stroop in borderline personality disorder. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2009 May;34(4):571-86. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.10.024.

  13. Vogt (2019): Cingulate impairments in ADHD: Comorbidities, connections, and treatment. Handb Clin Neurol. 2019;166:297-314. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64196-0.00016-9.

  14. Ikegami M, Sorama M (2023): Differential Neural Correlates in the Prefrontal Cortex during a Delay Discounting Task in Healthy Adults: An fNIRS Study. Brain Sci. 2023 May 3;13(5):758. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13050758. PMID: 37239230; PMCID: PMC10216123.

  15. Kayser, Allen, Navarro-Cebrian, Mitchell, Fields (2012): Dopamine, corticostriatal connectivity, and intertemporal choice. J Neurosci. 2012 Jul 4;32(27):9402-9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1180-12.2012.

  16. Horn, Dolan, Elliott, Deakin, Woodruff (2003): Response inhibition and impulsivity: an fMRI study. Neuropsychologia. 2003;41(14):1959-66., n = 19

  17. Fernandez-Ruiz, Hakvoort Schwerdtfeger, Alahyane, Brien, Coe, Munoz (2019): Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex hyperactivity during inhibitory control in children with ADHD in the antisaccade task. Brain Imaging Behav. 2019 Sep 6. doi: 10.1007/s11682-019-00196-3.

  18. Zhu Y, Liu S, Zhang F, Ren Y, Zhang T, Sun J, Wang X, Wang L, Yang J (2023): Response inhibition in children with different subtypes/presentations of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A near-infrared spectroscopy study. Front Neurosci. 2023 Mar 2;17:1119289. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1119289. PMID: 36937678; PMCID: PMC10017865. n = 91

  19. Weigard, Soules, Ferris, Zucker, Sripada, Heitzeg (2019): Cognitive Modeling Informs Interpretation of Go/No-Go Task-Related Neural Activations and Their Links to Externalizing Psychopathology. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2019 Dec 10:S2451-9022(19)30310-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.11.013. PMID: 32007431.

  20. García Beristain JC, de Celis Alonso B, Barragan Perez E, Dies-Suarez P, Hidalgo-Tobón S (2024): BOLD Activation During the Application of MOXO-CPT in School Patients With and Without Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. J Atten Disord. 2024 Feb;28(3):321-334. doi: 10.1177/10870547231217093. PMID: 38153047; PMCID: PMC10838480.

  21. Ferré S, Belcher AM, Bonaventura J, Quiroz C, Sánchez-Soto M, Casadó-Anguera V, Cai NS, Moreno E, Boateng CA, Keck TM, Florán B, Earley CJ, Ciruela F, Casadó V, Rubinstein M, Volkow ND (2022): Functional and pharmacological role of the dopamine D4 receptor and its polymorphic variants. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Sep 30;13:1014678. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1014678. PMID: 36267569; PMCID: PMC9578002. REVIEW

  22. Cao A, Hong D, Che C, Yu X, Cai Z, Yang X, Zhang D, Yu P (2023):The distinct role of orbitofrontal and medial prefrontal cortex in encoding impulsive choices in an animal model of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Front Behav Neurosci. 2023 Jan 6;16:1039288. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.1039288. PMID: 36688128; PMCID: PMC9859629.

  23. Dela Peña, Botanas, de la Peña, Custodio, Dela Peña, Ryoo, Kim, Ryu, Kim, Cheong (2018): The Atxn7-overexpressing mice showed hyperactivity and impulsivity which were ameliorated by atomoxetine treatment: A possible animal model of the hyperactive-impulsive phenotype of ADHD. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2018 Aug 17;88:311-319. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2018.08.012.

  24. Leo D, Adriani W, Cavaliere C, Cirillo G, Marco EM, Romano E, di Porzio U, Papa M, Perrone-Capano C, Laviola G (2009): Methylphenidate to adolescent rats drives enduring changes of accumbal Htr7 expression: implications for impulsive behavior and neuronal morphology. Genes Brain Behav. 2009 Apr;8(3):356-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2009.00486.x. PMID: 19243449.

  25. Van Dessel, Sonuga-Barke, Moerkerke, Van der Oord, Lemiere, Morsink, Danckaerts (2019): The amygdala in adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Structural and functional correlates of delay aversion. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2019 Apr 4:1-12. doi: 10.1080/15622975.2019.1585946.

  26. Martinez, Pasquereau, Drui, Saga, Météreau, Tremblay (2020): Ventral striatum supports Methylphenidate therapeutic effects on impulsive choices expressed in temporal discounting task. Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 20;10(1):716. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-57595-6. PMID: 31959838.

  27. Grimm, Kopfer, Küpper-Tetzel, Deppert, Kuhn, de Greck, Reif (2019): Amisulpride and l-DOPA modulate subcortical brain nuclei connectivity in resting-state pharmacologic magnetic resonance imaging. Hum Brain Mapp. 2019 Dec 27. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24913.

  28. Jupp, Sawiak, van der Veen, Lemstra, Toschi, Barlow, Pekcec, Bretschneider, Nicholson, Robbins, Dalley (2020): Diminished Myoinositol in Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex Modulates the Endophenotype of Impulsivity. Cereb Cortex. 2020 Jan 2. pii: bhz317. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhz317.

  29. Egarter (2019): Myo-Inositol. Gynäkologische Endokrinologie, February 2019, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 11–15

  30. Wu, Wang, Yang, Liu, Sun, An, Cao, Chan, Yang, Wang (2020): Altered brain white matter microstructural asymmetry in children with ADHD. Psychiatry Res. 2020 Jan 28;285:112817. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112817. PMID: 32035376. n = 205

  31. Cardinal, Winstanley, Robbins, Everitt (2004): Limbic corticostriatal systems and delayed reinforcement. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004 Jun;1021:33-50. doi: 10.1196/annals.1308.004. PMID: 15251872. REVIEW

  32. Cascone AD, Calabro F, Foran W, Larsen B, Nugiel T, Parr AC, Tervo-Clemmens B, Luna B, Cohen JR (2023): Brain tissue iron neurophysiology and its relationship with the cognitive effects of dopaminergic modulation in children with and without ADHD. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2023 Jul 7;63:101274. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2023.101274. PMID: 37453207; PMCID: PMC10372187.

  33. Kolodny, Mevorach, Stern, Biderman, Ankaoua, Tsafrir, Shalev (2019): Fronto-parietal engagement in response inhibition is inversely scaled with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptom severity. Neuroimage Clin. 2019 Dec 9;25:102119. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.102119.

  34. Arnatkeviciute A, Lemire M, Morrison C, Mooney M, Ryabinin P, Roslin NM, Nikolas M, Coxon J, Tiego J, Hawi Z, Fornito A, Henrik W, Martinot JL, Martinot MP, Artiges E, Garavan H, Nigg J, Friedman NP, Burton C, Schachar R, Crosbie J, Bellgrove MA (2023): Trans-ancestry meta-analysis of genome wide association studies of inhibitory control. Mol Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 27. doi: 10.1038/s41380-023-02187-9. PMID: 37500827.

  35. Müller, Candrian, Kropotov (2011): ADHS – Neurodiagnostik in der Praxis, Springer, Seite 85

  36. Montoya, Terburg, Bos, van Honk (2012): Testosterone, cortisol, and serotonin as key regulators of social aggression: a reviewand theoretical perspective.Motiv Emot 2012;36(1):65–73.

  37. Brandau (2004): Das ADHS-Puzzle; Systemisch-evolutionäre Aspekte, Unfallrisiko und klinische Perspektiven. Seite 35

  38. Oades, Slusarek, Velling, Bondy (2002): Serotonin platelet-transporter measures in childhood attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): clinical versus experimental measures of impulsivity. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2002 Apr;3(2):96-100.

  39. Nelson, Trainor (2007): Neural mechanisms of aggression. In: Nature Reviews Neuroscience. Band 8, Nr. 7, Juli 2007, S. 536–546, doi:10.1038/nrn2174, PMID 17585306

  40. Stadler, Zepf, Demisch, Schmitt, Landgraf, Poustka (2007): Influence of rapid tryptophan depletion on laboratoryprovoked aggression in children with ADHD. Neuropsychobiology 56:104–110

  41. Carrillo, Ricci, Coppersmith, Melloni (2009): The effect of increased serotonergic neurotransmission on aggression: a critical meta-analytical review of preclinical studies. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2009 Aug;205(3):349-68. doi: 10.1007/s00213-009-1543-2.

  42. Ferrari, Palanza, Parmigiani, de Almeida, Miczek (2005): Serotonin and aggressive behavior in rodents and nonhuman primates: predispositions and plasticity. Eur J Pharmacol. 2005 Dec 5;526(1-3):259-73.

  43. Huber, Smith, Delago, Isaksson, Kravitz (1997): Serotonin and aggressive motivation in crustaceans: altering the decision to retreat. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 May 27;94(11):5939-42.

  44. Wanke (2003): Impulsivität und dopaminerge resp. serotonerge Reagibilität. Ein Vergleich der Impulsivitätskonzepte von Cloninger und Zuckerman; Dissertation

  45. Cools R, D’Esposito M (2011): Inverted-U-shaped dopamine actions on human working memory and cognitive control. Biol Psychiatry. 2011 Jun 15;69(12):e113-25. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.03.028. PMID: 21531388; PMCID: PMC3111448. REVIEW

  46. Arnsten, Pliszka (2011): Catecholamine influences on prefrontal cortical function: relevance to treatment of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and related disorders. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2011 Aug;99(2):211-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2011.01.020. PMID: 21295057; PMCID: PMC3129015. REVIEW

  47. Hercigonja Novkovic, Rudan, Pivac, Nedic, Muck-Seler (2009): Platelet Serotonin Concentration in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder); Neuropsychobiology 2009;59:17–22; DOI:10.1159/000202825; n = 114

  48. Leffa, Ferreira, Machado, Souza, da Rosa, de Carvalho, Kincheski, Takahashi, Porciúncula, Souza, Cunha, Pandolfo (2019): Caffeine and cannabinoid receptors modulate impulsive behavior in an animal model of Attentional Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorder. Eur J Neurosci. 2019 Jan 22. doi: 10.1111/ejn.14348.

  49. Schwabe, Höffken, Tegenthoff, Wolf (2013):Stress-induced enhancement of response inhibition depends on mineralocorticoid receptor activation; Psychoneuroendocrinology (2013) 38, 2319—2326

  50. Cremone-Caira, Root, Harvey, McDermott, Spencer (2019): Effects of Sleep Extension on Inhibitory Control in Children With ADHD: A Pilot Study. J Atten Disord. 2019 May 29:1087054719851575. doi: 10.1177/1087054719851575.

Diese Seite wurde am 12.09.2024 zuletzt aktualisiert.